Since the gun ban has been reversed...

[Mobius]

Originally posted by freakoretardo:
  So.... back to the original point of my awesome thread:
 
 Can we be the Washington Bullets again now that we all embrace handguns and their awesomeness?

I love how the Bullet behind Elvin is wearing the wrong jersey.

[SPARX]

Originally posted by freakoretardo:
  So.... back to the original point of my awesome thread:
 
 Can we be the Washington Bullets again

I'd be behind it 100%

[RatBastard]

Originally posted by freakoretardo:
  Does that mean we get to go back to...
 
    <img src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/si_online/covers/images/1978/0508_large.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
    <img src="http://www.sportslogos.net/images/logos/6/587/full/5422.gif" alt=" - " />
 
 k
 
 thx
 
 bai

I always thought that name change was a tad odd.  They go from a team name of 'bullets' to 'wizards' for a team where the sport has a vast majority of black players.  To me 'wizard' has a whole lot more negative connotations than 'bullet' does.  I mean isn't (wasn't) the HMFIC of a certain anti-black organization called a 'wizard', 'imperial wizard', or 'grand wizard'?  I am shocked that Al Sharpton hasn't jumped on this bandwagon long ago.

[freakoretardo]

Originally posted by Mobius:
   

[/b]

I love how the Bullet behind Elvin is wearing the wrong jersey. [/QB]

Oh my god, I just noticed that. He has different color shorts on too.

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by RatBastard:
 

Originally posted by freakoretardo:
 [qb] Does that mean we get to go back to...
 
      I am shocked that Al Sharpton hasn't jumped on this bandwagon long ago. [/b]

Naaawwww, he wouldn't be interested because there's no cash to be made out of it.

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by vansmack:
   

Originally posted by vansmack:
  Let me write the dissenting opinion for you:
 
   

There's only one purpose for a handgun - to kill another human being.

That's all I would say. [/b]

[/b]

And animals, what about all the bambi murderers. I can understand killing another human because they're threatening you and your loved ones lives, but to sit in a tree in the pissing rain for hours on end to wait for a harmless deer to walk by then blow it's fucking brains out....that my friends, takes a real moron.

[sweetcell]

Originally posted by Shadrach:
  I don't defend the "need" for citizens to own guns, but I do defend their "right" to do so under the constitution. I also feel that the laws regulating the sale and ownership of guns should be ridiculously strict and enforced with outrageous penalties for the use of a gun while committing a crime.

agreed, but look at the shitstorm the brady bill brought about (alliteration, anyone?).  "what, i can't buy an AK-47 at my local drive-thru?!?".  i still don't understand why gun owners, or the orgs representing them (namely the NRA) won't sign up for gun owners having to register a round with the authorities - aka buy a gun and you have to give a spent bullet.  boggles my mind.

[HoyaSaxa03]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 And animals, what about all the bambi murderers.

really?  you think handguns are made to shoot deer?
 
 handguns/pistols have one purpose: to shoot humans in close quarters

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by Mobius:
   

Originally posted by Julian, certified WEBLEBRITY:
  You know, I was thinking about this earlier when this came up on MSNBC -- if Obama wants my vote you know what he can do? Promise to put the full force of an Obama Administration behind repealing the Second Amendment.
 
 

Go back to France, hippie [/b]

<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44778000/jpg/_44778165_hippies226.jpg" alt=" - " />

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 And animals, what about all the bambi murderers.

really?  you think handguns are made to shoot deer?
 
 handguns/pistols have one purpose: to shoot humans in close quarters [/b]

I think any type of firearm is made with the intention of putting a hole in something fleshy....it's what it gets pointed at by the prick on the other end that justifies the need for gun control.
 
 Unfortunately, in America, taking guns off the streets and out of the hands of the criminals is impossible, and the police cannot be expected to be everywhere so it's up to the law abiding citizens to protect themselves in this country. I have been all for gun control but now I'm considering getting my concealed weapons permit...actually I am getting my concealed weapons permit...and considering buying a gun for the protection of myself and my family because I can't rely on the police department to do it.
 
 It's just a sad reality of American life.

[TheREALHunter]

Originally posted by sweetcell:
   

Originally posted by Shadrach:
  I don't defend the "need" for citizens to own guns, but I do defend their "right" to do so under the constitution. I also feel that the laws regulating the sale and ownership of guns should be ridiculously strict and enforced with outrageous penalties for the use of a gun while committing a crime.

agreed, but look at the shitstorm the brady bill brought about (alliteration, anyone?).  "what, i can't buy an AK-47 at my local drive-thru?!?".  i still don't understand why gun owners, or the orgs representing them (namely the NRA) won't sign up for gun owners having to register a round with the authorities - aka buy a gun and you have to give a spent bullet.  boggles my mind. [/b]

It boggles my mind why people appear so ready and willing to bend over for the authorities.

[nkotb]

Why does no one shit their pants over having to license and register a car?  Honestly, that seems a lot more "Big Brother" to me than having to license a device made for killing.
 
 

Originally posted by TheREALHunter:
  It boggles my mind why people appear so ready and willing to bend over for the authorities.

[sonickteam2]

Originally posted by TheREALHunter:
   

Originally posted by sweetcell:
     

Originally posted by Shadrach:
  I don't defend the "need" for citizens to own guns, but I do defend their "right" to do so under the constitution. I also feel that the laws regulating the sale and ownership of guns should be ridiculously strict and enforced with outrageous penalties for the use of a gun while committing a crime.

agreed, but look at the shitstorm the brady bill brought about (alliteration, anyone?).  "what, i can't buy an AK-47 at my local drive-thru?!?".  i still don't understand why gun owners, or the orgs representing them (namely the NRA) won't sign up for gun owners having to register a round with the authorities - aka buy a gun and you have to give a spent bullet.  boggles my mind. [/b]

It boggles my mind why people appear so ready and willing to bend over for the authorities. [/b]

its funny that that same people that feel that Americans should be able to carry weapons have no problem with not being able to have toothpaste on an airplane!

[TheREALHunter]

Originally posted by Erinaceous Sonickus:
   

Originally posted by TheREALHunter:
     

Originally posted by sweetcell:
       

Originally posted by Shadrach:
  I don't defend the "need" for citizens to own guns, but I do defend their "right" to do so under the constitution. I also feel that the laws regulating the sale and ownership of guns should be ridiculously strict and enforced with outrageous penalties for the use of a gun while committing a crime.

agreed, but look at the shitstorm the brady bill brought about (alliteration, anyone?).  "what, i can't buy an AK-47 at my local drive-thru?!?".  i still don't understand why gun owners, or the orgs representing them (namely the NRA) won't sign up for gun owners having to register a round with the authorities - aka buy a gun and you have to give a spent bullet.  boggles my mind. [/b]

It boggles my mind why people appear so ready and willing to bend over for the authorities. [/b]

its funny that that same people that feel that Americans should be able to carry weapons have no problem with not being able to have toothpaste on an airplane! [/b]

I don't know if that's particularly true, there are plenty of gun owners who have a problem with the post-9/11 overreactions by various government agencies such as the TSA.

[HoyaSaxa03]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
  I think any type of firearm is made with the intention of putting a hole in something fleshy....it's what it gets pointed at by the prick on the other end that justifies the need for gun control.

pistols/handguns are specifically made for maneuverability in close-quarter combat against other humans ... you might use them to shoot squirrel or something, but that's definitely not what they're made for