Author Topic: The MLB Thread  (Read 627609 times)

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1650 on: May 17, 2016, 03:56:07 pm »
8 games for Roughneck Odor

I think most people would take that for punching Joey Bats.

 ;D

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4120
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1651 on: May 18, 2016, 07:57:13 am »
8 games for Roughneck Odor

I think most people would take that for punching Joey Bats.

 ;D

It was a beautiful sight. Only problem was Odor almost took out an Angels player last year. but, thanks for punching him in the face anyway.

hutch

  • Guest

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3291
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1653 on: May 26, 2016, 07:33:47 pm »

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1654 on: May 26, 2016, 07:42:16 pm »
sorry o's

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/just-8-teams-legit-shot-190241568.html

Might as well pack it in right now.


exactly.. the fat lady has sung...(of course this article is sheer idiocy... .)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1655 on: May 26, 2016, 08:03:02 pm »
I'm putting money on The Tribe right now!
27>34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3291
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1656 on: June 01, 2016, 03:31:36 pm »
162 games for Marlon Byrd

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1657 on: June 02, 2016, 12:02:38 pm »
162 games for Marlon Byrd

At least it's only a one year deal so his contract is essentially voided.
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1658 on: June 02, 2016, 11:11:04 pm »
Ace of MLB Stats @theaceofspaeder
#Nationals Bryce Harper Last 190 PA: 11 HR
#Angels Mike Trout Last 190 PA: 11 HR
#SFGiants Madison Bumgarner Last 190 PA: 11 HR
3:09 PM - 2 Jun 2016

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1660 on: June 16, 2016, 10:35:57 pm »
damnit Kate Upton why?


Now ....talk about my type....

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1661 on: June 21, 2016, 03:42:55 pm »
Corn (NE)

Which organization has the worst future: Yanks, Tigers, or Angels

David Schoenfield  (2:38 PM)

Hmm ...the trouble with the Tigers is if Miggy and V-Mart tail off, that's a pretty bad lineup. At least the Angels have Trout and maybe some pitching if Richards/Heaney return. Neither team has much in the minors. Next five years, I'd guess I'd go Yankees, Angels, Tigers.
27>34

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28522
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1662 on: June 21, 2016, 03:44:17 pm »
I'd guess I'd go Yankees, Angels, Tigers.
Is that from worst to best or best to worst? Tigers also have Zimmerman and Fullmer (with Norris coming) for the foreseeable future so pitching isn't looking like a total tire fire.

Also, don't look now but the Braves have won 5 straight.
LVMH

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1663 on: July 01, 2016, 11:22:10 am »
But Bobby Bo for $1.1m through 2035 is just a great story when the buyout was $5.9m.  Slays me!

Happy Bobby Bonilla day!

Every July 1 through 2035, the New York Mets pay him $1,193,248.20. 
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1664 on: July 06, 2016, 03:33:41 pm »
sorry o's

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/just-8-teams-legit-shot-190241568.html

Might as well pack it in right now.


exactly.. the fat lady has sung...(of course this article is sheer idiocy... .)

I'm putting money on The Tribe right now!

This is getting a little scary....
27>34