Author Topic: The MLB Thread  (Read 704742 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1245 on: May 19, 2015, 12:05:21 pm »
The Marlins experiment is fascinating to me.  I think Jennings fails miserably, but don't confuse that with me hoping he succeeds.  I just don't think he will...
27>34

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1246 on: May 19, 2015, 12:37:59 pm »
It's one of those things that just seems on its face as a 99% chance its a miserable tire-fire.
LVMH

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1247 on: May 21, 2015, 10:13:08 am »

How the entirety of this article isn't literally:

PEDs, obviously.

. . .is beyond me.
LVMH

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1248 on: May 21, 2015, 04:02:45 pm »
Let's hear it for that Tigers bullpen.  ::)
LVMH

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1249 on: May 21, 2015, 04:08:33 pm »
anybody notice those ads on ESPN called "Rule 661" all about AROD?? Seems like they are MLB ads... I'm surprised they are using him in  promo ads for baseball....

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1250 on: May 21, 2015, 04:42:59 pm »
Bumgarner just went yard off Kershaw.  :D
LVMH

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3332
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1251 on: May 22, 2015, 10:39:12 am »


Andrew McCutchen's pay stub

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1252 on: May 23, 2015, 12:55:18 pm »
Also good at sliding and stealing third base.

27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1253 on: May 23, 2015, 03:56:18 pm »
a little while ago I watched the Yankees give up TEN runs to the Rangers in the third inning

Kubacheck

  • Member
  • Posts: 518
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1254 on: May 23, 2015, 07:06:33 pm »
a little while ago I watched the Yankees give up TEN runs to the Rangers in the third inning

If someone could put it on a loop, I watch that over and over.....

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1255 on: May 25, 2015, 08:00:00 pm »
Josh Hamilton 0-3, with 2Ks.

Still a  bargain for the Rangers.
27>34

Kubacheck

  • Member
  • Posts: 518
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1256 on: May 25, 2015, 08:02:15 pm »
Josh Hamilton 0-3, with 2Ks.

Still a  bargain for the Rangers.

yeah, when someone else is paying almost your entire salary, that's almost always a bargain.... especially when you're gonna get the chance to beat them multiple times the rest of your tenure.....

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1257 on: May 27, 2015, 12:20:17 pm »
yeah, when someone else is paying almost your entire salary, that's almost always a bargain.... especially when you're gonna get the chance to beat them multiple times the rest of your tenure.....

Unless, you're paying them to have him in their lineup to actually hurt their team:

0-4, 1K.  Now 0-2 with RISP.

(I don't actually believe this, mind you, and I would have traded him to the Astros if I this were the case)
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1258 on: May 27, 2015, 01:00:17 pm »
Mets trade OF Kirk Nieuwenhuis to Angels for cash considerations.

I'm not going to lie - my first response was "Who?"
27>34

Kubacheck

  • Member
  • Posts: 518
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1259 on: May 27, 2015, 05:16:30 pm »
yeah, when someone else is paying almost your entire salary, that's almost always a bargain.... especially when you're gonna get the chance to beat them multiple times the rest of your tenure.....

Unless, you're paying them to have him in their lineup to actually hurt their team:

0-4, 1K.  Now 0-2 with RISP.

(I don't actually believe this, mind you, and I would have traded him to the Astros if I this were the case)

there might be some kernel of truth in this.... I don't think they would've traded him within the division unless they thought he was pretty much done, kinda like the Eagles trading McNabb to the Redskins.... the Eagles ended up being right, guess we'll get a chance to see if the Angels were.....