Author Topic: The MLB Thread  (Read 704193 times)

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 10389
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1920 on: February 22, 2017, 01:04:08 pm »
Why is it horrible? How often does one of the four tosses to the catcher actually do anything other the intended result?

At least twice for Jason Kipnis.

https://twitter.com/TheJK_Kid/status/834232382299402241?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Enews%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

StoneTheCrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 2297
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1921 on: February 22, 2017, 01:29:53 pm »
That only solidifies my point, methinks.

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 10389
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1922 on: February 22, 2017, 01:44:50 pm »
That only solidifies my point, methinks.

Are you also in favor of having a home run hitter skip circling the bases? Seems like a scenario even less likely to yield any kind of alternative result.

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1923 on: February 22, 2017, 02:18:28 pm »
How, how horrible is the new intentional walk rule?

Completely.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1924 on: February 22, 2017, 02:28:42 pm »

Are you also in favor of having a home run hitter skip circling the bases? Seems like a scenario even less likely to yield any kind of alternative result.

Only if you can break your bat over your knee first, then you can skip running the bases.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1925 on: February 22, 2017, 02:30:00 pm »
How, how horrible is the new intentional walk rule?

It depends on what the signal is from the dugout.  Might make for a nice gif to use on social media.
27>34

StoneTheCrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 2297
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1926 on: February 22, 2017, 04:03:56 pm »
That only solidifies my point, methinks.

Are you also in favor of having a home run hitter skip circling the bases? Seems like a scenario even less likely to yield any kind of alternative result.

Hmmmmm. Now there's a thought.

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3331
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1927 on: March 02, 2017, 11:53:04 am »
David Price has an MRI - goes to the NFL combine to meet with Dr. Andrews.  Forearm/elbow issue.

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3331
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1928 on: April 18, 2017, 04:23:47 pm »
80 games for Starling Marte

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1929 on: April 18, 2017, 06:05:58 pm »
14 games in and the Angels have already had a closed door team meeting.  That has to be some kind of record...
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1930 on: April 18, 2017, 06:13:56 pm »
80 games for Starling Marte

I forgot about the new rule that if Pittsburgh is still in contention when he is reinstated, he will be ineligible for the 2017 postseason.  That's a brutal loss for a franchise as small as Pittsburgh's.
27>34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3331
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1931 on: April 19, 2017, 10:37:27 am »
How is it that CB Bucknor is still a major league umpire?

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1932 on: April 19, 2017, 10:39:25 am »
How is it that CB Bucknor is still a major league umpire?
People are going ape over that "foul tip" but that's a one-play thing. His insanely-variable strikezone is every play of every game.
LVMH

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3331
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1933 on: April 19, 2017, 10:50:45 am »
How is it that CB Bucknor is still a major league umpire?
People are going ape over that "foul tip" but that's a one-play thing. His insanely-variable strikezone is every play of every game.

Oh yeah.  He's consistently awful.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1934 on: April 19, 2017, 12:18:56 pm »
The 7-2-6 Triple Play.

Don't see that everyday.
27>34