Author Topic: random . . . randomness  (Read 1933099 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3975 on: February 16, 2017, 02:46:23 pm »
Also, I just realized that I know the woman who did this study and I can't wait until I see her again!
27>34

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 11900
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3976 on: February 16, 2017, 02:47:55 pm »
Spaces argument is making me die right now. I don't think I've bumped into more than one true hairpie since 1994.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3977 on: February 16, 2017, 02:55:13 pm »
"true"??

Are you saying that you have run into some merkins?

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3978 on: February 16, 2017, 02:56:16 pm »
"true"??

Are you saying that you have run into some merkins?


Not since Olivia Wilde disappointed me.....
27>34

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 11900
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3979 on: February 16, 2017, 03:00:18 pm »
"true"??

Are you saying that you have run into some merkins?


No... I mean I haven't ran into more than one bush that was coming out of a bathing suit bottom which seems to be what Mr. SPACE enjoys. I don't considered well manicured pubic regions to be true bushes.

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 10391
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3980 on: February 16, 2017, 03:14:01 pm »
It's true, I haven't been exposed to many vaginas in the 55 to 64 years old category.

You're closer to 55 than you are 35!

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3981 on: February 16, 2017, 03:29:27 pm »
Then I must be a very attractive man.
oword

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3982 on: February 16, 2017, 03:30:02 pm »
Also, that was among the more retarded attempts at a burn I've seen in a few weeks.
oword

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 10391
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3983 on: February 16, 2017, 03:32:20 pm »
Apparently it's the golden girls who hold the pubic prize.


Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3984 on: February 16, 2017, 10:52:37 pm »
"women who had gone to college were 3.4 times more likely to groom than those who did not have a high school degree. Income also played a role: Women who made more than $100,000 a year were 22 percent more likely to groom than those who made less than $50,000 a year."
now brains are always hot in my opinion
on a magazine cover, you can just be hot
but you have got to have a brain with some critical thinking to be a true 10
« Last Edit: February 16, 2017, 10:54:50 pm by Are they friends of yours?🛠|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|🚀 »
slack

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3985 on: February 16, 2017, 11:27:26 pm »
^^ Julian's America, kids, Julian's America. . .
LVMH

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 10391
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3986 on: February 17, 2017, 10:03:07 am »
Also, that was among the more retarded attempts at a burn I've seen in a few weeks.

It was meant as an observation, not a burn.


Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 10391

walkie,talkie

  • Guest
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3988 on: February 17, 2017, 11:12:53 am »
Dionne Warwick . . . I love her.

walkie,talkie

  • Guest
Re: random . . . randomness
« Reply #3989 on: February 17, 2017, 01:15:34 pm »
has anybody clicked on space's video.  i have not, for I fell into that hole, of not to do it.