Author Topic: iphone  (Read 395718 times)

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5379
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: iphone
« Reply #495 on: April 15, 2010, 04:57:13 pm »
Move yr weight loss whining over to this thread. Thanks.
😐 🎶

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #496 on: April 15, 2010, 05:36:54 pm »
opera mini isn't good

Seems like users actually do want a choice, Steve.


This is the point.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #497 on: April 17, 2010, 09:56:45 pm »
Somebody just lost their job at Apple...

iPhone 4G/HD prototype found left at a bar in San Jose
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #498 on: April 19, 2010, 12:34:19 pm »
It's nearly official - that's your new iPhone.

  • it's thinner than the 3GS, with smaller internal components and a larger battery inside the metal frame.
  • a front-facing camera, a larger and better camera with a flash on the back,
  • a higher-res display that's slightly smaller than the current models,
  • a second mic for noise cancellation,
  • and a new back that is either glass or ceramic
  • three grams heavier than a 3GS, with a 16 percent larger battery and the same new MicroSIM slot used in the iPad.
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: iphone
« Reply #499 on: April 19, 2010, 02:29:23 pm »
<sig>

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: iphone
« Reply #500 on: April 20, 2010, 09:54:09 am »
Apparently gizmodo paid the finder $10,000? Was the leak intentional though or did some developer just leave it at a bar?

wml7

  • Member
  • Posts: 3061
Re: iphone
« Reply #501 on: April 20, 2010, 09:54:31 am »
story sounds fishy  ;D

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: iphone
« Reply #502 on: April 20, 2010, 11:23:43 am »
It's a true story...whether or not it's the next iphone remains to be seen, but it's definately apples device.

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: iphone
« Reply #503 on: April 20, 2010, 11:37:58 am »
Apparently gizmodo paid the finder $10,000?
How is that legal? I can't find something at a bar and decide to sell it. And the person buying it, especially if they know I found it at a bar and therefore have no ownership of it, is committing a crime too.

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: iphone
« Reply #504 on: April 20, 2010, 11:54:47 am »
its pretty obvious the leak was intentional at this point
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #505 on: April 20, 2010, 12:05:21 pm »
How is that legal?

It's absolutely not legal in California to sell found property without reasonable attempts to find the owner and turning it over to the police for a period of time (usually around 6 months, but 3 months in some jurisdictions).  The seller is liable for damages, and considering it's Apple, a suit will follow shortly for violation of trade secrets among many other things, I'm sure.

Where I disagree is with those that think it's intentional.  Apple doesn't need free marketing and Jobs runs one of the tightest shops around.  They also remotely deactivated it within minutes of it's appearance.  Somebody in Cupertino was in big trouble yesterday.

Other than that, I think Apple needs to buy HTC for their next phone in order to catch up.
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: iphone
« Reply #506 on: April 20, 2010, 01:08:10 pm »
i didnt think it was intentional up until i saw it on the today show. where's the c&d?
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #507 on: April 20, 2010, 01:42:40 pm »
Or Gizmodo....

« Last Edit: April 20, 2010, 01:49:58 pm by vansmack »
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: iphone
« Reply #508 on: April 20, 2010, 01:52:25 pm »
hmm still not sold on it being a "lost" phone, but i'm back to 50/50
o/\o

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: iphone
« Reply #509 on: April 20, 2010, 03:48:24 pm »
what's fishy to me is that this isn't a forceful C&D, but a polite "hey, can we have that back please?  thanks".

seems way to calm.  knowing apple, i'd expect a lot more offense.
<sig>