Originally posted by Bags:
BUT, I dont' think you can fault a band for trying to capture the general market price for their shows.
i agree wholeheartedly ... and the market price for coldplay is upwards of $60 because their US fanbase has shifted from
a) anglophiles and "early adopter" rock fans who listen to a lot of music (indie or not) and liked the first album ... these types (like a lot of people on here) go to a lot of concerts, many of which are in the $10-$30 range
to
b) "casual" rock fans who found out about the band on the radio or vh1 or those abc "yellow" ads a couple years back and have catapulted coldplay to one of the biggest rock bands in the US ... these people don't go to as many concerts, perhaps have larger disposable income than "rock nerds" (although that point isn't as essential), and therefore don't have any qualms spending upwards of $60 per ticket
if these people in category (b) went to every hot brit band that comes to this area (using the UK merely as an example here), then they'd spend $60 seeing a few "new" bands instead of spending that money seeing one band they like and are familiar with
coldplay is an enormous band now, they've crossed over to the mainstream in spectacular fashion and their fanbase now largely consists of people from category (b), so why not charge what they can afford and expect?
now, if coldplay wanted to maintain their "outsider" status among "early adopter" rock fans, then this probably wouldn't be the best way to go ... but obviously they could give a shit about that, and would rather be a big time "people's band"
nothing wrong with that.