Author Topic: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux  (Read 219136 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #300 on: June 10, 2014, 07:39:07 pm »
its over...even snyder must know it..

Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?
27>34

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #301 on: June 10, 2014, 10:33:25 pm »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".
FUKIT

atomic

  • Member
  • Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #302 on: June 10, 2014, 10:46:29 pm »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".

I have never heard anyone being offended by the Ravens, Orioles, Capitals, Nationals, DC United or 99 percent of other sports names.  Your argument is weak.

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #303 on: June 10, 2014, 11:49:27 pm »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".

thank you for this. it's refreshing to see that someone is finally starting to speak out for the camels.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 12:25:20 am by stevewizzle »

DeathFromAbove1979

  • Member
  • Posts: 5038
    • Twitter
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #304 on: June 11, 2014, 09:22:22 am »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".

I have never heard anyone being offended by the Ravens, Orioles, Capitals, Nationals, DC United or 99 percent of other sports names.  Your argument is weak.
Oh, people are offended.
‼‼?‼‼

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #305 on: June 11, 2014, 06:02:56 pm »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".

I have never heard anyone being offended by the Ravens, Orioles, Capitals, Nationals, DC United or 99 percent of other sports names.  Your argument is weak.

So just because you don't know about something means, never mind, I didn't notice who I was dealing with here.
FUKIT

atomic

  • Member
  • Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #306 on: June 11, 2014, 08:47:54 pm »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".

I have never heard anyone being offended by the Ravens, Orioles, Capitals, Nationals, DC United or 99 percent of other sports names.  Your argument is weak.

So just because you don't know about something means, never mind, I didn't notice who I was dealing with here.

Provide examples or your argument is as weak as it always is.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #307 on: June 11, 2014, 08:56:10 pm »
look its over.. the name has to go...its offensive to a lot of people.... even non-indians for crying out loud.

the crummy owner should get ahead of the story and change the name.. they could use a reboot anyways.... they've sucked since about 1993 for crying out loud.. that's more than two decades...

the owner should be smart and do it now.. not wait til his hand is ultimately forced which is what will happen... do it from a position of strength and maybe even exact some concessions in return

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28525
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #308 on: June 11, 2014, 09:10:59 pm »
Exact concessions from whom?
LVMH

atomic

  • Member
  • Posts: 2093
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #309 on: June 11, 2014, 09:12:20 pm »
Exact concessions from whom?

The Indians of course.  Get some of that casino money.

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28525
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #310 on: June 11, 2014, 09:19:09 pm »
Exact concessions from whom?

The Indians of course.  Get some of that casino money.
Now that's the first reasonable thing I've heard all day!
LVMH

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #311 on: June 11, 2014, 09:40:16 pm »
concessions from the NFL of course and also from DC... they'll be moving back to DC at some point and getting a very nice stadium and everything they want as long as they change the frickin' name...

I can't speak to what the NFL could "give" Snyder but I'm sure they could work out some nice handshake deal... When was the last time Washington hosted the Super Bowl, for example?

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #312 on: June 11, 2014, 09:47:22 pm »
This whole nonsense about the football team's name is about as silly as the people who are upset about the camel in the 'guess what day it is' commercials because using a camel might be offensive to some arabs.  If the criteria for words we cannot say any more is that the word in question might offend someone, then we need to ban all words.  I promise you that for any word we pick, someone somewhere will be offended by its use.  In the words of a semi-famous person form a few years back, "stop the insanity".

I have never heard anyone being offended by the Ravens, Orioles, Capitals, Nationals, DC United or 99 percent of other sports names.  Your argument is weak.

So just because you don't know about something means, never mind, I didn't notice who I was dealing with here.

Provide examples or your argument is as weak as it always is.

The camel issue is a perfect example.  there are many people who are offended by the silly use of the term "n-word", as if we all don't know what word it refers to.  When discussing the word 'nigger' as offensive as it is, are we not grown up enough that we can actually say the word we are talking about rather than saying "n-word" as if it made things any better?  Truth be told 99% of the so called politically correct" terms are just plain offensive and silly.
FUKIT

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #313 on: June 11, 2014, 09:49:16 pm »
look its over.. the name has to go...its offensive to a lot of people.... even non-indians for crying out loud.

the crummy owner should get ahead of the story and change the name.. they could use a reboot anyways.... they've sucked since about 1993 for crying out loud.. that's more than two decades...

the owner should be smart and do it now.. not wait til his hand is ultimately forced which is what will happen... do it from a position of strength and maybe even exact some concessions in return

EVERY word is offensive to some people.  I agree with you that sooner or later the name will change.  It has nothing to do with what is right or wrong though, it has more to do with the PC crap that has taken over the USA.
FUKIT

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Those Darned Redskins, Pt. Deux
« Reply #314 on: June 11, 2014, 09:54:15 pm »
heck maybe- i know its outlandish- he could get some compensatory draft picks... additional cap space...a lower royalty rate on merch... I don't know.... I'm sure Snyder and the NFL lawyers can come up with something in private.

its embarrassing to the NFL to have the team with this name... make them pay for the embarrassment to go away..