Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
i have no problem with nathan coming in for a 3rd inning. . .he used to be a starter. . .3 innings should be nothing. there's no excuse for jacque jones lobbying it in. . .jeter would have been out if he throws a strike to the catcher.
I'm a little surprised by this.
He hadn't thrown 3 innings in over a year and half. Only once this season did he throw more than one inning, and that was in the beginning of the season. His pitch count never reached 50 all season long. He had thrown 11 straight balls, was lucky to get Olerud to swing at ball 4, walked two straight, and Gardenhire lets him face A-Job with two on?
It was understandable to bring him in in the 10th - if you win, you have a day off and don't need him in game 3. But if a gassed closer is your only hope, then how did you win 90+ games all season? He surely didn't pitch in all of those wins.
Great, so if Jones throws the ball home, maybe Jeters out. But if A-Jobs ball doesn't bounce out of the park, the game was already over. Why was he facing A-Job? Why was nobody warming up when your closer started his third inning?
And I'm not picking on Gardenhire exclusively. Dumd moves like this seem to happen a lot when teams play the Yankees.
And I was screaming at Scioscia to bring in Donnelly to face Varitek too. Go with what got you there and manage for this win. If you're content to let K-Rod throw two innings, why not let Donnelly get one fucking out for you? Your starter is at 110 pitches!!!!!