Author Topic: MLB Playoffs 2007  (Read 30384 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #60 on: October 09, 2007, 02:26:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
  so i suppose no one else cares to talk about baseball anymore with me.   :(  
I'm a sports fan first and a Halo's fan second, it just takes a little while for me to get over things.  Especially the most uninspired performance from the Halo's I've ever seen...
 
 But that's in the past.  The ALCS is very exciting.  I am drooling over the Beckett/Sabathia mathcup - it's rare that you get both Cy Young Candidates facing off like that and we may get it more than once.
27>34

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #61 on: October 09, 2007, 02:37:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   I am drooling over the Beckett/Sabathia mathcup - it's rare that you get both Cy Young Candidates facing off like that and we may get it more than once.
I was thinking about that myself.  I'll give the advantage to Beckett because a) i'm a sox fan  and b) left-handers in Fenway...not as good.
 
  the first game is uber-important because i give Carmona the edge over Daisuke and Schilling the edge over Westbrook or Byrd (whoever they go with, i'd go with Byrd).
 
   and by the time they get to Wakefield/Lester..well who knows.
 
  but i think whoever wins game 1, will be the easy favourite to go up 2-1 in the series.
 
  Both teams are hitting and pitching so well, i dont know whether this is going to be 12-10 games or 2-1!!!  
 
   I'll hold on my "prediction" cause i am already thankful i didnt jinx them last round.
 
   cant wait for Friday...and plus, its always so much more relaxing when we're NOT playing the Yankees.

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #62 on: October 09, 2007, 02:42:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  But that's in the past.  The ALCS is very exciting.  I am drooling over the Beckett/Sabathia mathcup - it's rare that you get both Cy Young Candidates facing off like that and we may get it more than once.
yeah. . like the ubaldo jimenez/doug davis match-up.  wow!
OU812

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #63 on: October 09, 2007, 05:21:00 pm »
OY!!! HOW ABOUT THEM CAPS THEN?????  :D  
 
 Longest winning streak since 03/04 isn't it?

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3326
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #64 on: October 09, 2007, 05:44:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
  OY!!! HOW ABOUT THEM CAPS THEN?????   :D  
 
 Longest winning streak since 03/04 isn't it?
Gotta be the cool new uni's.

Mobius

  • Member
  • Posts: 1289
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #65 on: October 09, 2007, 05:54:00 pm »
Its easy to forget that the 1996-2000 Yankees teams were not a collection of superstars - but an intelligent mix of high character Ballplayers with bulletproof chemistry. Cashman took over in 1998 - the peak - and they've gradually lost the plot more every year.  The 1996 Yankees were much more similar to the 2007 Indians than the 2007 Yankees.  
 
 The Yankees have very quietly wasted Jeter's prime and logged 7 consecutive disappointing seasons.  Yes they've made the playoffs each year, but they haven't won a World Series since the start of the GWB administration - and that's sad when you throw $200 million on your roster.
 They've been plugging holes with overpriced duct tape since 2000.
 
 Indians / Red Sox should be a lot of fun.  Rockies / DBacks . . . not so much.

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #66 on: October 09, 2007, 05:59:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
 ...they haven't won a World Series since the start of the GWB administration - and that's sad when you throw $200 million on your roster.
If Bushie can claim that on his resume, that pretty much IS his legacy.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #67 on: October 09, 2007, 06:00:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Shemp:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
  OY!!! HOW ABOUT THEM CAPS THEN?????    :D    
 
 Longest winning streak since 03/04 isn't it?
Gotta be the cool new uni's. [/b]
Retro....but not quite!
 
 "New Vintage"

crevers

  • Member
  • Posts: 213
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #68 on: October 14, 2007, 01:14:00 am »
It's 1:09am, and I'm still watching Game 2 of Cleveland/Boston.  I'm happy I had Coke instead of beer with dinner, or else I definitely wouldn't be awake right now.
 
 Who here woulda thunk that Carmona and Schilling would struggle as much as they did?  Also, how bad is Gagne?  He has single-handedly given the Indians hope in the top of the 11th.  As much as he struggled in mop-up work in Game 1, why put him out there when it matters?

crevers

  • Member
  • Posts: 213
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #69 on: October 14, 2007, 01:32:00 am »
Hahahaha.  It's 1:29am, and I've seen the Indians score more runs in the last 20 minutes than they managed to score in the previous 5 hours.  Tums and bedtime for me.  GO TRIBE!

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #70 on: October 15, 2007, 01:04:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by dhinojwala:
  Also, how bad is Gagne?  He has single-handedly given the Indians hope in the top of the 11th.  As much as he struggled in mop-up work in Game 1, why put him out there when it matters?
Congrats to your Tribe for doing exactly what I had hoped the Angels would do in the first series (I believe I even laid the scenario out on page 1 of this thread): lose to Becket, hang in game two until Gagne comes in, and then win and give yourself home field advantage.  I watch way too much baseball.
27>34

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #71 on: October 15, 2007, 01:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by dhinojwala:
  Also, how bad is Gagne?  He has single-handedly given the Indians hope in the top of the 11th.  As much as he struggled in mop-up work in Game 1, why put him out there when it matters?
Congrats to your Tribe for doing exactly what I had hoped the Angels would do in the first series (I believe I even laid the scenario out on page 1 of this thread): lose to Becket, hang in game two until Gagne comes in, and then win and give yourself home field advantage.  I watch way too much baseball. [/b]
well, to be truthful, you didnt really cite Gagne as the sole loser in the Sox bullpen.
 
   you cited, Gagne, Oki and then called the bullpen generally "shakey"
 
   also, i dont know if they really "came back" on Saturday night.  they had the biggest lead of the night and were winning when both starters had gone.  so dont buy "comeback win" as really a good way to describe it.
 
   It's unforunate they lost but i believe 2 things
 
  1.) we still have a good chance at taking games 3 & 5 for a 3-2 lead back to Fenway
 
  2.) Gagne probably wont be pitching anymore this series and i doubt Lopez gives up all those hits on his own.
 
 
  on a side note:  not really sure why Sox Julian Tavarez is hanging in the dugout all game long and why it seems he's unavailable in the series.
 
  i'll do some digging, but i want him out there before Jon Lester and preferrrably out there in the 5th and 6th innings.  This wouldve moved all pitchers back and inning or two and perhaps Gagne wouldnt have come in til the 12th or 13th, when perhaps we could've won it by then.
 
  we'll see what Daisuke is made of tonight. He likes to strike guys out, and Cleveland likes to strike out.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #72 on: October 15, 2007, 02:26:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
    also, i dont know if they really "came back" on Saturday night.
I don't know that Dhino or I used those words in any of our posts on game 2.
27>34

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #73 on: October 15, 2007, 02:30:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
    also, i dont know if they really "came back" on Saturday night.
I don't know that Dhino or I used those words in any of our posts on game 2. [/b]
i was reading back from your Angels posts.
 
  one other thing....totally different feeling losing to the Indians than the Yankees.  i am SO glad we're not playing them...every loss is like twice as bad.
 
   though, i do want to be the team to shut this Rockies hullabaloo up.

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4124
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #74 on: October 15, 2007, 03:43:00 pm »
Aw, but the Rockies have never won the World Series!  I think it's kinda cool.  But, I'm also not a Boston fan (unless they're playing the Yankees)