Author Topic: MLB Playoffs 2007  (Read 30383 times)

Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #75 on: October 15, 2007, 03:45:00 pm »
You're on the Red Sox? What position do you play, pitcher or catcher?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
   
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
    also, i dont know if they really "came back" on Saturday night.
I don't know that Dhino or I used those words in any of our posts on game 2. [/b]
i was reading back from your Angels posts.
 
  one other thing....totally different feeling losing to the Indians than the Yankees.  i am SO glad we're not playing them...every loss is like twice as bad.
 
   though, i do want to be the team to shut this Rockies hullabaloo up. [/b]

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #76 on: October 16, 2007, 02:57:00 pm »
I'm a little disappointed that I didn't get an interview....
 
 Angels GM resigns, replaced by Reagins
 
 And if you think I'm joking about sending in my resume, you don't know me very well.
27>34

Lazer Guided Melodies

  • Member
  • Posts: 299
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #77 on: October 16, 2007, 06:44:00 pm »
Last time the Rockies lost a game, I went and saw The Aliens and they put a smile back on my face.  In fact, since I saw them play the song Rox, the Rox have not lost.  Hence, I have been blasting the Aliens before every game including while making my way to game 4 last night.  After the one game playoff, and the game 3 sweep of the Phils, I did not think I could ever experience a better baseball game.  Last night topped them both as it was truly magical.  After the trophy presentation, Fuentes and Francis came up our aisle and we followed them to behind the left field seats where they raised the National League Champions flag.  I then gave Francis a high five.  How is this for my October 27th and 28th, game 3 of the series with a nightcap of Kinski and The Warlocks, game 4 of the series with the possibility of catching half of JAMC.  There is only one Rocktober.  Bring on the AL!

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21764
  • I don't belong here.
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #78 on: October 16, 2007, 07:47:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
  Its easy to forget that the 1996-2000 Yankees teams were not a collection of superstars - but an intelligent mix of high character Ballplayers with bulletproof chemistry.
while i appreciate the sentiment you're trying to get across, that writing is worthy of danielle steele.  barf.
<sig>

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3326
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #79 on: October 16, 2007, 09:35:00 pm »
Racist much?
 
  <img src="http://www.dtownbaseball.com/wp-content/tigerpics/indians.gif" alt=" - " />

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3326
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #80 on: October 16, 2007, 09:36:00 pm »
Sorry about that - go Tribe!

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3326
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #81 on: October 16, 2007, 09:49:00 pm »
Oh, and from Boz:
 
 'But, except for the $143 million, buy-a-title Red Sox -- who now look so much like the Empire they claim to hate that they should consider switching to pinstripes -- this October is going to be a tale about how less can be more. '
 
 Amen, brother.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #82 on: October 16, 2007, 10:09:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   Wake the knuckler struggled the last month.
 
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  I'm pretty sure most Sox fans are uncomfortable with either choice - Dice K (15-12, 4.40 ERA) or the banged up Schilling (9-8, 3.87 ERA).  Boston fans can't feel comfortable with this, especially if they split at Fenway.
 
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
 
 How are you Sox fans feeling about your backend? Do you even want to see Gagne touch a baseball?  
Damn.  I just wrote about the wrong series.  This Tribe team is doing everything I hoped the Angels would do - Boston has been on it's heels since Gagne came in late in game 2.
27>34

anarchist

  • Member
  • Posts: 363
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #83 on: October 16, 2007, 10:18:00 pm »
no yankees. if no boston, fox will be upset.  no one will watch.

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #84 on: October 16, 2007, 10:18:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Shemp:
  Oh, and from Boz:
 
 'But, except for the $143 million, buy-a-title Red Sox -- who now look so much like the Empire they claim to hate that they should consider switching to pinstripes -- this October is going to be a tale about how less can be more. '
 
 Amen, brother.
i was just thinking about how this feels like a yankees/sox series with the sox in the yankees' role
(o|o)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #85 on: October 16, 2007, 10:25:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by anarchist:
    no one will watch.
I will.
27>34

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #86 on: October 16, 2007, 11:03:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   Wake the knuckler struggled the last month.
 
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  I'm pretty sure most Sox fans are uncomfortable with either choice - Dice K (15-12, 4.40 ERA) or the banged up Schilling (9-8, 3.87 ERA).  Boston fans can't feel comfortable with this, especially if they split at Fenway.
 
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
 
 How are you Sox fans feeling about your backend? Do you even want to see Gagne touch a baseball?  
Damn.  I just wrote about the wrong series.  This Tribe team is doing everything I hoped the Angels would do - Boston has been on it's heels since Gagne came in late in game 2. [/b]
I beg to differ. i know you pride yourself on your sports knowledge, but its really been the lack of hitting on Bostons sides, or the backend of Clevelands rotation that did them in.
   losing 4-2 is not "really" Dice-K's fault, no one expected him to hold Cleveland scoreless! and our bullpen held very steady last night.
 
    i think you're only seeing whats right about your original posts. Wake's our 4th starter, it doesnt take a genius to figure out we dont want him picthing a crucial game! (tell Francona that though)
 
   duh!

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #87 on: October 16, 2007, 11:06:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by anarchist:
    no one will watch.
I will. [/b]
not it!

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #88 on: October 16, 2007, 11:13:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
 I beg to differ...but its really been the lack of hitting on Bostons sides
Besides Becket, no starter has made it through the 5th.
 
 Schilling 4.2 Innings, 9 hits, 5 ER
 Dice-K 4.2 Innings, 4 ER on 6 hits and 2 walks
 Wake 4.2 Innings, 5 ER on 5 hits and 2 walks
 
 Sorry man, but that's bad starting pitching with an ERA of well over 7 no matter how you look at it.  It would take a ridiculous amount of offense to overcome that.  That's why, in the playoffs, it's all about pitching.
27>34

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: MLB Playoffs 2007
« Reply #89 on: October 16, 2007, 11:20:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
   
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
 I beg to differ...but its really been the lack of hitting on Bostons sides
Besides Becket, no starter has made it through the 5th.
 
 Schilling 4.2 Innings, 9 hits, 5 ER
 Dice-K 4.2 Innings, 4 ER on 6 hits and 2 walks
 Wake 4.2 Innings, 5 ER on 5 hits and 2 walks
 
 Sorry man, but that's bad starting pitching with an ERA of well over 7 no matter how you look at it.  It would take a ridiculous amount of offense to overcome that. [/b]
first
 
  we DID overcome it in Game 2
 
  game 3 we scored 2 runs, I know you dont follow the Sox every day, but we arent built to win that many 2-1 ballgames.
 
  and tonight was starter number 4.  
 
  i still think 3 starters deep we win series if we can hit decently.
   
  Sabathia and Carmona both looked like Poo as well.  hence my "backend of Cleveland's rotation" bit.  
 
  Westbrook and Byrd combined for what, 13 innings and 4 runs (2 of which came with a 4-0 lead and 2 others with a 7-0 lead)?  it'd take some damn good pitching to overcome that too..