The 2020 thread....

[kosmo vinyl]

turns out one of the participates in that "press conference" is a known sex offender from NJ who has run for multiple offices there... wonder if he made a side trip after the presser :p

[gavroche]

Everyone sees what they want to see....

Doesn't see what they want to see, is probably more accurate.

[gavroche]

should Biden's DOJ investigate Trump and his clan for all of their crimes?  Does it help deter people from doing the same thing in the past, and kill him off as a political force? 

1.Biden and the dems need to reign in Executive power and put some laws/consequences on the books.  My understanding is that the Hatch act and Emoluments clause have no teeth and are more gentleman's agreements, not laws.  Especially the stuff about nepotism and security clearances.  The party in power never wants to do, but if we don't do it, we'll run into this again
2. Well with DJT...NYstate (and possibly) other states may have quite a docket for him to deal with.  But I do think that DOJ should do a lot of digging in Jared, Ivanka, D Jr. and Eric.  As well as the Roger Stone/Rudy and their ilk.  I think there was a LOT of dirty dealing done with this crowd and I want it investigated and documented

Or is it something that should be avoided because it hurts with national unity?

Yes...that's why I think the DOJ let's the states do the dirty work with Don. I don't think the DOJ should put a former president on trial.
What pisses me off about these national unity pleas (and I'm somewhat one of them) is it is very one sided and my opinion is if the shoe was on the other foot, no effort would be made for leiency

I general agree that it's better if the states take the lead.  It looks less political.  That said, the federal crimes are different.

[GetThee2aHatcheryıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl]

turns out one of the participates in that "press conference" is a known sex offender from NJ who has run for multiple offices there... wonder if he made a side trip after the presser :p

isn't the point of porn...that you aren't sexually offending some one?

--asking for a friend

[GetThee2aHatcheryıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl]

In order to pass a relief bill, trump and McConnell want immunity from prosecution from all lawsuits, for all their actions relating to Corona-virus. 
has this really been said or am I being gullible?

[grateful]

So it's easier to explain to Trump that he actually won but can't do anything about it, rather than trying to convince him that he actually lost.

But senior officials, campaign aides and allies told the Associated Press that overwhelming evidence of fraud isn’t really the point.

The strategy to wage a legal fight against the votes tallied for Biden in Pennsylvania and other places is more to provide Trump with an off-ramp for a loss he can’t quite grasp and less about changing the election’s outcome, the officials said. They spoke to AP on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy.

Trump aides and allies also acknowledged privately the legal fights would — at best — forestall the inevitable, and some had deep reservations about the president’s attempts to undermine faith in the vote. But they said Trump and a core group of loyalists were aiming to keep his base of supporters on his side even in defeat.

[hutch]

Everyone sees what they want to see....

Doesn't see what they want to see, is probably more accurate.

That makes no sense


You mean “doesn’t see what they don’t want to see”?

[gavroche]

Everyone sees what they want to see....

Doesn't see what they want to see, is probably more accurate.

That makes no sense


You mean “doesn’t see what they don’t want to see”?

No, means I didn't see from Biden what I wanted to see from him.  It wasn't anything he actually did (ok, sure fracking pissed me off), it was the absence of what he did that frustrated me.

[hutch]

Everyone sees what they want to see....

Doesn't see what they want to see, is probably more accurate.

That makes no sense


You mean “doesn’t see what they don’t want to see”?

No, means I didn't see from Biden what I wanted to see from him.  It wasn't anything he actually did (ok, sure fracking pissed me off), it was the absence of what he did that frustrated me.

Right he should have said ban fracking for you to be happy so we could be ushering in a second Trump term.

Fortunately Biden did what he needed to do to win an election here on planet earth not planet what Gavroche wants

Man you are tiresome

[hutch]

The loony left cracks me up! Ok Biden - who we said could never win - wins but he doesn’t do it in the style we wanted...didn’t quite hit the right buzzwords!


GTFO


In the end Biden needed Blacks in certain big cities, and moderate moms in certain suburbs way more than Bernie supporters

Progressives now feel left out! Wah wah

“You should have run on no fracking”


Wah wah

[hutch]

And the reason democrats lost- except for Biden- is because the American people didn’t appreciate the Mueller report and impeachment. You know:the impeachment the progressives in the party insisted on having forgetting (?) we didn’t have the votes in the senate.

But yeah let’s pin it on the one guy that came through and won!

[GetThee2aHatcheryıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl]

by the way...White Men also delivered this Biden win...

2016  39 percent voting for Hillary Clinton
2020  42 percent voted for Joe Biden

I mean that 3% is not anything to shrug

(I mean on the whole, we still kinda suck...but suck a little less now)

[hutch]

Do we? After the past four years?


There is a problem with men in America.


Think tanks should stop jerking off to hypothetical war games and give this everything they got.

[hutch]

Between the socialist left and the Republicans it’s tough being a liberal.....

[Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI]

by the way...White Men also delivered this Biden win...

2016  39 percent voting for Hillary Clinton
2020  42 percent voted for Joe Biden

I mean that 3% is not anything to shrug

This is the worst take ever.