Author Topic: An essay from Thom Yorke  (Read 7288 times)

sonickteam2

  • Guest
An essay from Thom Yorke
« on: September 09, 2003, 09:39:00 am »
from atease...dont know if anyone has read this yet....
 
 
 Losing the faith
 
 Thom Yorke
 Monday September 8, 2003
 The Guardian
 
 The west is creating an extremely dangerous economic, environmental and humanitarian timebomb. We are living beyond our means. The poorest countries need to trade on fair terms with us if they are ever to get off their knees. Handouts are no longer the answer.
 When the WTO started out, poor countries were spun the line that they could gain access to western markets if they signed up to a pro-business agenda - even though that agenda was potentially at the cost of their already suffering populations.
 
 The west has not fulfilled its part in those agreements. It has reneged on its agreement to cut subsidies to its own farmers, and rules on intellectual property rights mean drugs are too expensive and 30,000 people die every day as a direct consequence. When developing countries export to the west they have to pay tariffs four times that between western countries themselves, costing £63bn per year.
 
 Why?
 
 Western governments, as they increasingly lose their grip on the reality of the situation, see the key to fixing these problems (that they have helped to create) to be... more liberalisation.
 
 This, to me, feels like a bus full of religious lunatics rolling into town singing free trade songs and banging tambourines as war and famine break out and all about them turns to shit. It's nonsense. Why should the most desperate continue to cooperate with such fools when they increasingly have nothing left to lose? They are not seeing the so-called benefits but they are seeing too much of the costs.
 
 This sort of free trade capitalism is a faith. A faith against all the odds. Nowadays it seems to have taken on the authority of the word of God, as if it has always been thus. But all it is really is a set of trade rules that should and could benefit all, and could be changed. Why should it be a corrupt protection racket?
 
 There must be a change to trade rules in favour of the poor and the environment. International human rights must be respected. There must be corporate accountability so that multinationals are taken to task over corruption, human rights and environment abuses.
 
 What the developing countries need is to be able to protect the livelihoods of their own farmers and allow their industries to develop.
 
 Increasingly the effects of such globalisation make it clear the only ones benefiting are the multinational corporations, who have the ear of our governments and are having their free trade cake and eating it. They make sure any rules affecting their "freedoms" are first on the agenda at the WTO.
 
 Poor countries are told this is free trade - this is the way we succeeded, this is how we built our great capitalist system.
 
 The amnesia and hypocrisy is breathtaking.
 
 Even the World Bank now admits that a nation's economy needs protection for it to grow in its early stages of development, just as it did in the UK, US and Asia. The constant mantra of the "trickle-down" effect of wealth creation is comical. It's so last week, dahling.
 
 What the poorest countries need are specific policies that improve their situation in their terms.
 
 When I got involved in Jubilee 2000, and tried to persuade governments, the IMF and the World Bank to cancel the unpayable debts it seemed like a reasonably fair thing to ask.
 
 The situation was so utterly ridiculous I didn't believe they would deny us. But they did.
 
 They found every excuse they could, but the only reason that I could find was that the west cannot shake its need to control the rest of the planet in any way it can. They cannot shake off this colonial attitude. In order to keep order they have to have fingers permanently wrapped around throats.
 
 Debt burdens are a beautifully tight noose, and now, even better, they have the WTO to do the dirty work for them.
 
 Poor countries at the WTO have been too scared to speak out, for fear of making their situation worse, and they are outnumbered. Sometimes countries cannot afford to send even one representative to the WTO meetings. Yet the EU can send 500. Much of the agenda is still decided by the rich nations in closed meetings. The WTO, thus far, has been hijacked.
 
 But I think this is the turning point. This is a crossroads in the global economic system. Do we carry on preaching this free unfettered trade garbage or do we admit our mistakes and try to do the right thing for once?
 
 The Trade Justice Movement states that if Africa, east Asia, south Asia and Latin America could increase their share of world exports by 1% it would lift 128 million people out of poverty. Just how difficult is that?
 
 Â· Thom Yorke (lead singer of Radiohead), on my small soapbox in a hotel bathroom in Washington DC.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2003, 09:44:00 am »
Bono?  Is that you?

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2003, 09:45:00 am »
No, it's Gwinnie's boyfriend from Coldplay.

Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2003, 09:46:00 am »
Why can't musicians just stick to entertaining us, and politicians stick to being assholes?
 
    Anybody heard the new Howard Dean blues album?

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2003, 09:46:00 am »
Does that mean another concept album is on the way?

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2003, 10:16:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
  Does that mean another concept album is on the way?
lets hope not.
 
   But you know what....i may be wrong, but it seems as much as Bono has stuck his nose in everyone elses business...U2 hasnt really ever written one of those "concept" albums.  And as political as some songs seem to be, he's kept "his" views and "U2" view seperate....i think.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2003, 10:25:00 am »
ever wonder why its whiny Brits guys who go on about this?
 
 Why can American men not step up to the plate. Has the bling-bling blinded them?

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2003, 10:42:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
  ever wonder why its whiny Brits guys who go on about this?
 
 Why can American men not step up to the plate. Has the bling-bling blinded them?
Beastie Boys and Tibet
 
 Neil Young, John Mellencamp & Willie Nelson and Farm Aid
 
 Henry Rollins and The West Memphis 3
 
 Eddie Vedder and Ticketmaster
 
 Steve Earle and capital punishment
 
 Greg Ginn and homeless felines.....

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2003, 10:47:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
   
Greg Ginn and homeless felines..... [/b]
Ohh, you forgot Metallica and Napster......
 
 all of those issues are worthy, I guess, but have very little impact on mine own little world. Or on a global scale.
 
 
 <<<Couldnt farm aid be seen as a bad thing? Isnt it part of the unfair competition that Thom Yorkie is on about?>>>
 <<<genuine question I dont know the answer to>>>

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2003, 10:50:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
 
 <<<Couldnt farm aid be seen as a bad thing? Isnt it part of the unfair competition that Thom Yorkie is on about?>>>
 <<<genuine question I dont know the answer to>>>
"Bad" for whom?
 
 I don't think the family farmers like Ma and Pa Rhett Miller would find subsidies for small American farmers to be a bad thing.
 
 But yes, in terms of your question, Farm Aid is working in the opposite direction of what York is fighting for.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14992
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2003, 10:51:00 am »
jello biafra and Krist Novoselic - wto
T.Rex

mankie

  • Guest
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2003, 10:57:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  Why can't musicians just stick to entertaining us, and politicians stick to being assholes?
 
     
My thoughts entirely...The other thing that bugs me is when the media jump all over the things celebs say about Bush etc....they are allowed their opinions too.
 
 markie...I just learned what "bling bling" means, and now I know it pisses me off even more.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2003, 10:59:00 am »
Tom Morello (RATM and Audioslave) and Serj Tankian (System of a Down) -- www.axisofjustice.org  -- WTO, war, corporations, third world debt, environment, homelessness, human rights, indigenous rights, racism, etc....

bearman🐻

  • Member
  • Posts: 5454
Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2003, 01:25:00 pm »
Why shouldn't musicians have the right to say what they think?  You got a voice? Use it.  Eminem uses his in his music, and we are subjected to his crap.  Thom Yorke wants to say something with a bit of insight and thought about his opinion and he should shut up?  Give me a break.  Bono, Bob Geldof, Chrissie Hynde, etc. have come out to speak up for people (or in Chrissie's case, animals) that don't have a voice.  Good for them.

Re: An essay from Thom Yorke
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2003, 01:35:00 pm »
I think the problem is when the loyal subjects of said musicians take the word of their idols to be the end all and be all on whatever subject. As if Mr. Musician somehow has some inside track on information and the workings of the world.