Originally posted by vansmack:
By the way, after looking at the site, are we really starting 4 outfielders and two DH's (Utility) or has that stuff just not been set yet?
I haven't set the final numbers, because I didn't know how many teams would be in ... I'm actually kind of (pleasantly) surprised that we have 14 ...
here's my thoughts on the roster topic (and I think i posted this on the first page of this thread):
I don't want teams of superstars ... we should have to have people like cezar izturis on our team ... we should have to scrounge all over the waiver wire and find out that mark kata is having a good week ... we should have to know if a AAA stud is getting called up for a look at the bigs in september ...
Otherwise it just turns into who has the better draft, who gets luckier drafting the superstars who happen to have a better year or don't get injured.
I once played in an NFL league with 1 qb, 1 rb, 2 wr and 1 flex position ... it was the most fucking boring thing i've ever done in my life
I usually just run an NL-only league to fix all these issues, but they're just as easily addressed by having an all-MLB league and expanding roster sizes
OK, rant over ... there are 30 MLB teams and 14 fantasy teams in this league ... that means there are 30 starting infielders at each position in the big leagues, we only need to find the best 14 of those 30, which will mean mostly stars for our starting rosters ... enough bench slots should mean that other starters will be on rosters
there are 90 starting outfielders in MLB, and seeing that outfielders are generally more offensively productive than infielders, i don't think it's a stretch at all to have 56 (14 x 4) of them on our starting rosters ... i wouldn't mind terribly switching it to 3, but i'd prefer 4...
we could also make the utility slots more specified (i.e., "corner infielder" or "middle infielder")
thoughts?