V-Fest Prediction / Wishlist

[ggw]

Brian Wallace is like those hippies who wouldn't trust anyone over 30.  
 
 Brian Wallace hates hippies.
 
 Ergo, Brian Wallace hates himself.

[sonickteam2]

Brian wallace is over 30. guaranteed.
 
  ergo, he's a total liar, now can we STOP talking about him, jesus, this is why i stopped posting in the first place months ago.

[DeathFromAbove1979]

boring -_-

[wml7]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[burning6down]

I think I said this on another page, but you're a fag Brian.

[bearman🐻]

Hey hey...being a fag isn't a negative, in fact in my book you're paying him a compliment and that's just not cool. Think about how much better our lives are because of homosexuals. So many contributions to society...from Aristotle to Michelangelo to Darby Crash to Bob Vila. I mean COME ON. Not to mention Tom Cruise and John Travolta. (OK, we can delete those two Scientology freaks.) I do however think that slunt is a word I'd warmly embrace. Or maybe a tool.

[saintangelsin]

Hey! We have figured out that Gogol Bordello are playing V-fest. They'll be on Saturday's line-up. The source is their label's website. Good stuff, right?
 
 So far, we can check one name on my list    
 
 As for the Brian non-sense...To ignore the past in terms of music would be to destroy pop music. Music, just like literature, functions with traditions. The reason why some of these bands matter is because they broke rules and lead different movements, ideas, and cultures. Without The Stooges and the Velvet Underground, most indie rock would not exist. I have a great appreciation for current music by loving and knowing music from the past. So to disreguard the past is to disreguard everything. And plus, music that is based on another band that was influenced by another band (which comes from the past) is music that tends to get super boring and is bastardizing a genre. I would sincerely hope that a band who wants that Interpol sound (Yes I once had some hipster fuck tell me that's the sound his band wants) at least knows who Gang of Four and Joy Division were (that same hipster idiot had no clue who they were- very sad and it explains why his band sucked). Things tend to be less organic when one doesn't investigate music at a deeper level. By going to the root of a source, you can see perhaps the genius of the newer stuff because you notice how that newer band breathes new life into an otherwise already done sound. (I think this is something even the kids at Pitchfork would agree with me about this!)

[burning6down]

I didn't mean fag in the literal sense. I meant douchebag, but I like saying fag.

[bearman🐻]

Oh ok...it's all good then.  

[DeathFromAbove1979]

Originally posted by burning6down:
  I didn't mean fag in the literal sense. I meant douchebag, but I like saying fag.

Like the way Eminem says fag.

[eros]

Originally posted by burning6down:
  I didn't mean fag in the literal sense.

You didn't mean to call him a cigarette?

[burning6down]

Originally posted by eros:
   

Originally posted by burning6down:
  I didn't mean fag in the literal sense.

You didn't mean to call him a cigarette? [/b]

No, nor a bundle of sticks.
 
 Um, since when were Michaelangelo and Aristotle fairies?

[sweetcell]

Originally posted by Brian Wallace:
   

 you say everyone else is a prisoner of nostalgia, yet REM's track record (i.e. the fact that they have one) colors your judgement.  newsflash: we're not prisoners of the past, brian.  you are.

1.)  Your argument makes no sense.  Their "track record colors my judgement?"  WTF?  Thank you pimply, Pitchfork critic.  Thank God you weren't on a debate team or anything.  You'd suck.[/b]

actually i was on the debating team, and my school did rather well.  you, however, wouldn't have rated as our water-boy.  you say my argument makes no sense, but fail to show how so.  "wtf?" is not an argument.  lemme dumb it down for ya: because of who they were (aka their track record), you're unable to see who they are.  better?
 
 borrowing a phrase from your previous incarnation, the only argment you make is ad hominem.  to be expected when a dimwit like yourself is grasping at straws.
 

Originally posted by burning6down:
 Um, since when were Michaelangelo and Aristotle fairies?

um, they were humans, not fairies.

[Brian_Wallace]

Originally posted by sweetcell:
  actually i was on the debating team, and my school did rather well.  you, however, wouldn't have rated as our water-boy.  you say my argument makes no sense, but fail to show how so.  "wtf?" is not an argument.  lemme dumb it down for ya: because of who they were (aka their track record), you're unable to see who they are.  better?
 
 borrowing a phrase from your previous incarnation, the only argment you make is ad hominem.  to be expected when a dimwit like yourself is grasping at straws.

Ah, you get so pissy and bitchy...  You should go out and get laid or something.  Get a girlfriend.  Step away from your computer.  Stop playing "World of Warcraft."  Get some fresh air.  Play a sport.  Get your heart rate up.  Maybe you can borrow some of "vansmack"'s porn that he furiously entertains himself to while his doctor wife brings home the paycheck.
 
 Brian

[burning6down]

Originally posted by sweetcell:
 

Originally posted by burning6down:
 Um, since when were Michaelangelo and Aristotle fairies?

um, they were humans, not fairies. [/QB]

If you didn't know (and apparently you don't), fairy=gay