Originally posted by Julian, good manners AFICIONADO:
Originally posted by callat703:
I'm still waiting for a rebuttal from Julian.
A rebuttal to what? I asked you well over a week ago for Obama's trackrecord of political successes and you, first, tried to pass off him having a college degree as such, and then a week later, second, you copy and pasted his bio. I doubt team HopeChangeHope was making up stuff in his bio. What's there to rebut?
It still stands uncontested he's a first-term Senator who passed, wrote, and co-sponsored far, far, far fewer bills then his democratic challenger and has zero executive experience. If you want to argue he has a better track record of bringing about change, even your Team ChangeHopeChange buddies will have to laugh at you. [/b]
You asked for legislative accomplishments, to which I openly said I wasn't going to direct you to information that is readily available all over the web. After you repeated the same statement and clearly misrepresented the facts, I decided to just copy and paste it for you, as you were obviously too lazy to go and find it yourself. Go get on Wiki - or did you choose to ignore that part of the above post, that includes a bibliography fully explaining his legislative record.
You also were either a) wrong, or b) lying when you tried to represent that the only pieces of legislation that Obama was involved in related to a post office and recognition of the Congo (the quote, if I need remind you: "On the other hand, Obama has exactly 2 such pieces of legislation during the same time: one encouraging the DRC to take up democracy and one naming a post office.") So which is it? Ignorance, or dishonesty?
And now you've changed your argument: fewer bills, as opposed to no bills.
Make up your mind. You're starting to sound like your candidate.