Author Topic: The Case Against Coldplay  (Read 6355 times)

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
The Case Against Coldplay
« on: June 05, 2005, 11:01:00 pm »
Hmm, this should start some forum tongues wagging...
 
 June 5, 2005
 
 The Case Against Coldplay
 By JON PARELES
 The New York Times
 
 THERE'S nothing wrong with self-pity. As a spur to songwriting, it's right up there with lust, anger and greed, and probably better than the remaining deadly sins. There's nothing wrong, either, with striving for musical grandeur, using every bit of skill and studio illusion to create a sound large enough to get lost in. Male sensitivity, a quality that's under siege in a pop culture full of unrepentant bullying and machismo, shouldn't be dismissed out of hand, no matter how risible it can be in practice. And building a sound on the lessons of past bands is virtually unavoidable.
 
 But put them all together and they add up to Coldplay, the most insufferable band of the decade.
 
 This week Coldplay releases its painstakingly recorded third album, "X&Y" (Capitol), a virtually surefire blockbuster that has corporate fortunes riding on it. (The stock price plunged for EMI Group, Capitol's parent company, when Coldplay announced that the album's release date would be moved from February to June, as it continued to rework the songs.)
 
 "X&Y" is the work of a band that's acutely conscious of the worldwide popularity it cemented with its 2002 album, "A Rush of Blood to the Head," which has sold three million copies in the United States alone. Along with its 2000 debut album, "Parachutes," Coldplay claims sales of 20 million albums worldwide. "X&Y" makes no secret of grand ambition.
 
 Clearly, Coldplay is beloved: by moony high school girls and their solace-seeking parents, by hip-hop producers who sample its rich instrumental sounds and by emo rockers who admire Chris Martin's heart-on-sleeve lyrics. The band emanates good intentions, from Mr. Martin's political statements to lyrics insisting on its own benevolence. Coldplay is admired by everyone - everyone except me.
 
 It's not for lack of skill. The band proffers melodies as imposing as Romanesque architecture, solid and symmetrical. Mr. Martin on keyboards, Jonny Buckland on guitar, Guy Berryman on bass and Will Champion on drums have mastered all the mechanics of pop songwriting, from the instrumental hook that announces nearly every song they've recorded to the reassurance of a chorus to the revitalizing contrast of a bridge. Their arrangements ascend and surge, measuring out the song's yearning and tension, cresting and easing back and then moving toward a chiming resolution. Coldplay is meticulously unified, and its songs have been rigorously cleared of anything that distracts from the musical drama.
 
 Unfortunately, all that sonic splendor orchestrates Mr. Martin's voice and lyrics. He places his melodies near the top of his range to sound more fragile, so the tunes straddle the break between his radiant tenor voice and his falsetto. As he hops between them - in what may be Coldplay's most annoying tic - he makes a sound somewhere between a yodel and a hiccup. And the lyrics can make me wish I didn't understand English. Coldplay's countless fans seem to take comfort when Mr. Martin sings lines like, "Is there anybody out there who / Is lost and hurt and lonely too," while a strummed acoustic guitar telegraphs his aching sincerity. Me, I hear a passive-aggressive blowhard, immoderately proud as he flaunts humility. "I feel low," he announces in the chorus of "Low," belied by the peak of a crescendo that couldn't be more triumphant about it.
 
 In its early days, Coldplay could easily be summed up as Radiohead minus Radiohead's beat, dissonance or arty subterfuge. Both bands looked to the overarching melodies of 1970's British rock and to the guitar dynamics of U2, and Mr. Martin had clearly heard both Bono's delivery and the way Radiohead's Thom Yorke stretched his voice to the creaking point.
 
 Unlike Radiohead, though, Coldplay had no interest in being oblique or barbed. From the beginning, Coldplay's songs topped majesty with moping: "We're sinking like stones," Mr. Martin proclaimed. Hardly alone among British rock bands as the 1990's ended, Coldplay could have been singing not only about private sorrows but also about the final sunset on the British empire: the old opulence meeting newly shrunken horizons. Coldplay's songs wallowed happily in their unhappiness.
 
 "Am I a part of the cure / Or am I part of the disease," Mr. Martin pondered in "Clocks" on "A Rush of Blood to the Head." Actually, he's contagious. Particularly in its native England, Coldplay has spawned a generation of one-word bands - Athlete, Embrace, Keane, Starsailor, Travis and Aqualung among them - that are more than eager to follow through on Coldplay's tremulous, ringing anthems of insecurity. The emulation is spreading overseas to bands like the Perishers from Sweden and the American band Blue Merle, which tries to be Coldplay unplugged.
 
 A band shouldn't necessarily be blamed for its imitators - ask the Cure or the Grateful Dead. But Coldplay follow-throughs are redundant; from the beginning, Coldplay has verged on self-parody. When he moans his verses, Mr. Martin can sound so sorry for himself that there's hardly room to sympathize for him, and when he's not mixing metaphors, he fearlessly slings clichés. "Are you lost or incomplete," Mr. Martin sings in "Talk," which won't be cited in any rhyming dictionaries. "Do you feel like a puzzle / you can't find your missing piece."
 
 Coldplay reached its musical zenith with the widely sampled piano arpeggios that open "Clocks": a passage that rings gladly and, as it descends the scale and switches from major to minor chords, turns incipiently mournful. Of course, it's followed by plaints: "Tides that I tried to swim against / Brought me down upon my knees."
 
 On "X&Y," Coldplay strives to carry the beauty of "Clocks" across an entire album - not least in its first single, "Speed of Sound," which isn't the only song on the album to borrow the "Clocks" drumbeat. The album is faultless to a fault, with instrumental tracks purged of any glimmer of human frailty. There is not an unconsidered or misplaced note on "X&Y," and every song (except the obligatory acoustic "hidden track" at the end, which is still by no means casual) takes place on a monumental soundstage.
 
 As Coldplay's recording budgets have grown, so have its reverberation times. On "X&Y," it plays as if it can already hear the songs echoing across the world. "Square One," which opens the album, actually begins with guitar notes hinting at the cosmic fanfare of "Also Sprach Zarathustra" (and "2001: A Space Odyssey"). Then Mr. Martin, never someone to evade the obvious, sings about "the space in which we're traveling."
 
 As a blockbuster band, Coldplay is now looking over its shoulder at titanic predecessors like U2, Pink Floyd and the Beatles, pilfering freely from all of them. It also looks to an older legacy; in many songs, organ chords resonate in the spaces around Mr. Martin's voice, insisting on churchly reverence.
 
 As Coldplay's music has grown more colossal, its lyrics have quietly made a shift on "X&Y." On previous albums, Mr. Martin sang mostly in the first person, confessing to private vulnerabilities. This time, he sings a lot about "you": a lover, a brother, a random acquaintance. He has a lot of pronouncements and advice for all of them: "You just want somebody listening to what you say," and "Every step that you take could be your biggest mistake," and "Maybe you'll get what you wanted, maybe you'll stumble upon it" and "You don't have to be alone." It's supposed to be compassionate, empathetic, magnanimous, inspirational. But when the music swells up once more with tremolo guitars and chiming keyboards, and Mr. Martin's voice breaks for the umpteenth time, it sounds like hokum to me.

distance

  • Member
  • Posts: 1241
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2005, 11:10:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  Hmm, this should start some forum tongues wagging...
 
 June 5, 2005
 
 The Case Against Coldplay
 By JON PARELES
 The New York Times
 
hilarious.

hitman

  • Member
  • Posts: 632
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2005, 11:43:00 pm »
Quite entertaining and well written...
 
 I've never really gotten the big deal about Coldplay.  And personally they make me want to spit now with the tix prices they are charging.  :o

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2005, 12:08:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  In its early days, Coldplay could easily be summed up as Radiohead minus Radiohead's beat, dissonance or arty subterfuge.
funny and well-written piece ... and while i agree with the final conclusion (i dont really like the band), i think this argument (which is the crux of the piece) is kind of lazy
 
 he's dissing coldplay mainly for not "pushing the envelope" musically and not using "dissonance or arty subterfuge" like radiohead ... the problem with most rock nerds is that they often give good reviews to straightforward, uncomplicated pop (see annie, powerpop, twee, etc), as long as its not commercially successful ... but once a band sells records they open themselves up to the "they're just a watered-down radiohead" complaints
 
 now i really dont like coldplay that much, but it's not because they lack "radiohead's arty subterfuge and dissocance", and i bet this guy likes plenty of bands that meet that description too
(o|o)

Herr Professor Doktor Doom

  • Member
  • Posts: 3745
    • my blog
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2005, 12:19:00 am »
yeah, I don't really like Coldplay either, but it seemed like he wanted to write a funny rant, and then tried to come up with rational reasons for the rant, and that kind of fell flat.
_\|/_

Yank

  • Guest
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2005, 01:45:00 am »
" Particularly in its native England, Coldplay has spawned a generation of one-word bands - Athlete, Embrace, Keane, Starsailor, Travis and Aqualung among them"
 
 
 I'd be the last person to defend Coldplay, but Embrace, Starsailor and Travis were recording songs before (Starsailor may have been about the same time) Parachutes, so were not spawned by them.  The author of the article seemed more interested in the "emo" lyrics....I can't stand the band because of their repetive, boring song structures.

bellenseb

  • Member
  • Posts: 1880
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2005, 09:35:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
  he's dissing coldplay mainly for not "pushing the envelope" musically and not using "dissonance or arty subterfuge" like radiohead ... the problem with most rock nerds is that they often give good reviews to straightforward, uncomplicated pop (see annie, powerpop, twee, etc), as long as its not commercially successful ... but once a band sells records they open themselves up to the "they're just a watered-down radiohead" complaints
 
 now i really dont like coldplay that much, but it's not because they lack "radiohead's arty subterfuge and dissocance", and i bet this guy likes plenty of bands that meet that description too
I think the point is not that Coldplay makes "simple, uncomplicated pop", but that they do it in such a calculated, bloodless, orchestrated, overwrought, self-important, boring, "passive-agressive blowhard" sort of way. I don't think that you'd describe most current power-pop/indie-pop bands like this. Say, Fountains of Wayne or the New Pornographers. The Parales piece was a bit of a letdown after seeing the headline; I wonder if his editors made him overly qualify himself.

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2005, 09:37:00 am »
One good point that I thought the article made is that Coldplay songs now revolve almost totally around Chris Martin (his voice and piano). I loved the first album because almost every song had a really interesting guitar part that gave it a snakey twist or a weird vibe. They didn't exactly bury his voice, but the key component that I remember from Yellow or Shiver or Spies is the guitar. The second album had a couple interesting guitar parts, but at that point, it was all about Chris's voice and piano.
 
 I have to admit that I think Speed of Sound is a really pretty song, but Coldplay has lost what made them interesting in the first place.
oword

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2005, 09:38:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr Dodgy Slapper:
  " Particularly in its native England, Coldplay has spawned a generation of one-word bands - Athlete, Embrace, Keane, Starsailor, Travis and Aqualung among them"
 
 
 I'd be the last person to defend Coldplay, but Embrace, Starsailor and Travis were recording songs before (Starsailor may have been about the same time) Parachutes, so were not spawned by them.  The author of the article seemed more interested in the "emo" lyrics....I can't stand the band because of their repetive, boring song structures.
Not to mention the trend of one-word band titles for the Brits started a good ten years before Coldplay; Blur, Pulp, Placebo, Oasis, and Radiohead, anyone?

amnesiac

  • Member
  • Posts: 1203
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2005, 09:52:00 am »

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2005, 11:48:00 am »
Is the album even out yet?  I'm already weary of it all....(though I will keep my mouth shut as I will soak up every bit of inane publicity surrounding the Foo album...).

amnesiac

  • Member
  • Posts: 1203
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2005, 11:50:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  Is the album even out yet?  I'm already weary of it all....(though I will keep my mouth shut as I will soak up every bit of inane publicity surrounding the Foo album...).
Yeah, I think it came out Tuesday. I have their first two, but really don't care much to pick up this new one.

Fico

  • Guest
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2005, 11:57:00 am »
I think the album is brilliant. Sadly most people who write about music don't have the first clue as to what it takes to write a song and how making things sound simple and effortless is most of the time harder than being "studenty" about it...

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6144
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2005, 12:01:00 pm »
I'm pretty sure their albums are case enough against Coldplay.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: The Case Against Coldplay
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2005, 12:02:00 pm »
Alright, were's all the bloody Coldplay fans??? When I made a comment that wasn't exactly praising them I was pretty much attacked by everyone except dodgy slapper, now you're all on the bash Coldplay bandwagon.
 
 Over here in spud-land, some are saying Coldplay are going to knock U2 off their "greatest rock band to ever grace a stage" pedestal. I laugh mockingly at such a comment, but on the other hand....at least Martin won't be as self-righteous and as much an interferring do-gooder who actually knows squat about what he's preaching about, at least I hope not. Naw...that's would be impossible.
 
 I still predict that in 2 years time you'll all be saying "cold what?"
 
 For the record...U2 definately do a great live show. Their shows seem so rehersed though(which they are) and just as much a visual as they are musical. Oasis is much more spontaneous, raw and energetic, which for me anyway, is what a rock concert should be.