PJ is to Nirvana as Billy Corgan is to My Bloody Valentine. Just sayin.
For a while, Smashing Pumpkins were a great band. But Billy Corgan is entering into the territory of the absurd by calling himself Smashing Pumpkins when the reality is that it's the Billy Corgan Experience. "Gish" was a solid debut. "Siamese Dream" was pretty amazing and if they had stopped there, they would have been labeled one of the best bands of the 90's. "Mellon Collie" had some pretty beautiful stuff on it, and if they just did one LP, again...they'd be legendary. The biggest issues with the Pumpkins were the drama surrounding their fracture (I saw them right before Jonathan Melvoin died, and it was an AWFUL performance) and then there's Billy Corgan's fat mouth. When you demand being labeled a genius, nobody is going to give you that honor. The only way Corgan could have gotten that is if he was the one that od'ed in 1996.
Corgan doesn't understand how to function in society or with others in general, that's the most obvious thing ever.
I don't get the butthurt so many people feel about him calling the current band "The Smashing Pumpkins." I really don't. Robert Smith does the same thing with The Cure. And in this day and age, you know what you're getting. You know it's Billy Corgan and a bunch of hired guns. If the ticket said "Billy Corgan" and it was the same band playing the same setlists, I think most people who liked classic SP would find it a great night, but there's this insane fringe of weirdos who REFUSE to like it literally because of what name is printed on the ticket, which is intellectually weak.
I've seen SP several times since 2007 and don't have any real interest in making any effort to see them again soon. (Haven't gotten Monuments and don't know if I will.) But the whole "this isn't Smashing Pumpkins" argument is just stupid.