Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1154999 times)

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1830 on: October 17, 2016, 02:12:26 pm »
yeah..Bob does like money..that is for sure..

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1831 on: October 24, 2016, 11:04:03 am »
Pitchfork's 50 Best Shoegaze Albums list

Loving these unexpected best shoegaze, ambient, etc lists they're dropping. Love seeing Ulrich Schnauss, Catherine Wheel, and Kitchens of Distinction -- all 3 of which I am making a point to listen to today -- getting some props (along with the obvious people in the top 10).
LVMH

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1832 on: October 24, 2016, 11:26:21 am »
they missed Soda Stereo's Dynamo but of course if ain't sung in English forget about it... no matter how good it is...

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10295
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1833 on: October 26, 2016, 12:01:14 pm »

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10295
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1834 on: October 26, 2016, 12:56:33 pm »

walkie,talkie

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1835 on: October 29, 2016, 09:42:13 am »
just read this inter,esting article about phil Collins, the song, against all odds, and the academy awards performance of it, not by him.

poor, guy.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1836 on: October 29, 2016, 09:48:33 pm »
just read this inter,esting article about phil Collins, the song, against all odds, and the academy awards performance of it, not by him.

poor, guy.

Why is this not in the Phil Collins thread???

I was listening to the 12" long mix of Mama.. what a song..talk about spooky...

walkie,talkie

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1837 on: October 30, 2016, 01:18:30 am »
I forgot there was one.

I tried, to think, but nothing happened.

walkie,talkie

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1838 on: November 03, 2016, 10:32:19 pm »
jesus, Mariah Carey

wow.  way, to show what you only care about in life.  and it ain't, self respect.

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1839 on: November 04, 2016, 09:34:53 am »


slack

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1840 on: November 04, 2016, 01:09:42 pm »
advice for the dude on the left: look like you belong.

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1841 on: November 04, 2016, 04:40:11 pm »
advice for the dude on the left: look like you belong.
I know...that kinda why I posted
but Frank is probably pulling in more than both of them

and Ian really has to stop with that stupid hand on chin pose
slack

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1842 on: November 04, 2016, 04:47:22 pm »
advice for the dude on the left: look like you belong.
But he doesn't belong. The other two aren't milquetoast Dad rock.
LVMH

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1843 on: November 04, 2016, 05:44:29 pm »
advice for the dude on the left: look like you belong.
But he doesn't belong. The other two aren't milquetoast Dad rock.


oh I know... ;)

challenged

  • Member
  • Posts: 3116
    • Instagram
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #1844 on: November 05, 2016, 03:06:13 pm »
advice for the dude on the left: look like you belong.
But he doesn't belong. The other two aren't milquetoast Dad rock.

In other news..., it's totally okay not to belong. He reveres them; they like him/tolerate him(?) Who knows? Who is to judge?