Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1319125 times)

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 11972
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3975 on: April 10, 2025, 12:54:17 pm »
how is that loser still out and about making music and touring... hasn't put out a decent record in approaching 20 years... he's a complete lunatic.

edit: space saw him at Iota
« Last Edit: April 10, 2025, 01:14:49 pm by Yada »

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3976 on: April 10, 2025, 01:16:17 pm »
edit: space saw him at Iota
actually I don't think he did, but I did


and you are not wrong about the 24 albums he's released in the last two decades, there are a few gems...but very few
why can't he just do like ween or billy Joel
« Last Edit: April 10, 2025, 01:18:00 pm by BearHatch lııllı|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl »
slack

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3977 on: April 11, 2025, 07:18:55 am »
Macalester College is pleased to announce that Robert A. (Bob) Mould, the trailblazing guitarist, singer, songwriter, and activist, will be the keynote speaker for the 2025 Commencement ceremony. Mould will also receive an honorary degree.
slack

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3978 on: April 17, 2025, 09:58:24 pm »



Chris Stein
The ad that we put in the @villagevoice that Clem answered. Mid March 1975. This took a lot of true detective work to dig out; hours, days, of looking through files.
slack

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10814
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3979 on: April 22, 2025, 09:28:09 am »

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3980 on: April 24, 2025, 11:48:50 am »
Eat a bag of dicks Sharron

After Sharon Osbourne called for Kneecap's work visas to be revoked, the group responded by telling her to listen to Black Sabbath's "War Pigs."
slack

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10814
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 4867
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3982 on: April 27, 2025, 10:00:43 pm »
You got to love it White Stripes got one of the fewest public vote totals and get in. Meanwhile Billy Idol and Phish did well with the public vote and don’t get in….

They really need to do away with the public vote.

Democracy American style

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5535
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3983 on: April 27, 2025, 10:11:24 pm »
You got to love it White Stripes got one of the fewest public vote totals and get in. Meanwhile Billy Idol and Phish did well with the public vote and don’t get in….

They really need to do away with the public vote.

Democracy American style

It's not a democracy, it's a meritocracy, and that's why Bad Company got it.
😐 🎶

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 4867
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3984 on: April 27, 2025, 10:17:55 pm »
Fair - except Bad company was mediocre (Free I would approve of)- but why have people vote if it doesn’t matter? To give it the impression they care what you think when in reality they care about what they want. And why are critics and industry folk better at deciding who deserves to be in than regular music listeners?

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3985 on: April 27, 2025, 10:25:23 pm »
pretty weak sauce that the winner of the pop vote doesn't get in
why even ask

although I would posit they are not rock nor roll and may have been disqualified on stench alone
slack

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 4867
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3986 on: April 27, 2025, 10:51:39 pm »
pretty weak sauce that the winner of the pop vote doesn't get in
why even ask



I just told you: to give you the illusion you have some say. Kind of like you get one vote and Elon gets one vote plus $250 million.

Julian, Hyperpop SLUTFUCK

  • Member
  • Posts: 29306
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3987 on: April 27, 2025, 11:12:43 pm »
There’s no objective, subjective, qualitative, or quantitative measure in which Phish can hold a candle to Bad Company.

And Bad Company is Clash-level terrible.
LVMH

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 4867
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3988 on: Today at 12:32:12 am »
There is absolutely no fuckin’ doubt Phish should be in the RRHOF.

Along with -to some limited degree DMB -they took the whole jam band thing to stratospheric heights.

Think about all the jam bands that have followed.

Yes, I can hear the guffaws, that’s a lot to answer for! But if a music act is incredibly successful and influential I think that’s enough to get in regardless of one’s own opinion of the greatness of the music. And anyways I think up to about 1998 Phish music was quality.

But that’s the main criteria in my mind:

Popularity or success
Influence
Quality

I view influence as the most important. But if you have influence and popularity or influence and quality you should get in. The Velvet Underground, for example, are in because they had influence and quality even if their records all stiffed. Grand Funk was simply popular so they don’t get in.

It’s hard for me to understand the Chubby Checker induction. He helped popularize a dance craze but that’s about it. But am not opposed to him getting in. It wouldn’t have bothered me if every nominee but Mana had gotten in.




hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 4867
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3989 on: Today at 12:37:17 am »
Of course the biggest snub is New Order.

The most important musical act of the past 45 years and they can’t get in even combined with Joy Division!

But it was expected.