Author Topic: Orioles....part 2?  (Read 330785 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #465 on: September 16, 2014, 05:14:40 pm »
We're not too far off what the pundits are thinking:

Matt (Milford, DE )

If you're Buck Showalter, what does your postseason rotation look like?

David Schoenfield  (1:23 PM)

I think some of it depends on matchups. I believe Bud Norris, for example, has a good record against the Angels. Maybe he pitches in Anaheim. Maybe Chen goes against a lefty-leaning team like Oakland or Seattle. But I guess you go Tillman and then Gonzalez the way he's been pitching. After that? Who knows, although I'd love to bet on Gausman right now.
27>34

James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #466 on: September 16, 2014, 10:20:00 pm »
Like I said...

Ubaldo on the mound tonight so you may get your wish.

Would be ironic and yet somehow fitting if they clinched with Ubaldo on the mound.


Going Wednesday - I'm hoping they split the first two with Toronto.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #467 on: September 16, 2014, 11:26:05 pm »
Baltimore Orioles and their fans: WE the Washington Nationals and its fans want to welcome you to the 2014 major league baseball playoffs...what took you so long??? We been waiting for you... ;D

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #468 on: September 16, 2014, 11:31:30 pm »
Congratulations to the Orioles on clinching their first division title since 1997 (remember Albert Belle? man that seems like ancient history...nearly 20 years ago!)... as a team that has clinched two of the past three NL Division East titles we know how hard it is and we salute you for finally winning something again......

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #469 on: September 16, 2014, 11:36:28 pm »
Like I said...

Ubaldo on the mound tonight so you may get your wish.

Would be ironic and yet somehow fitting if they clinched with Ubaldo on the mound.

Going Wednesday - I'm hoping they split the first two with Toronto.



Seems to me you said they might win or they might lose.  Good call Swami.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 11:44:22 pm by Shemp »

hutch

  • Guest
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #470 on: September 16, 2014, 11:46:51 pm »
Like I said...

Ubaldo on the mound tonight so you may get your wish.

Would be ironic and yet somehow fitting if they clinched with Ubaldo on the mound.

Going Wednesday - I'm hoping they split the first two with Toronto.



Seems to me you said they might win or they might lose.  Good call Swami.

it really is brilliant soothsayering . ... in the James Fordian universe the term IF ("if they clinched with Ubaldo") means "YUP! I CALLED IT BABY!"

James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #471 on: September 17, 2014, 08:19:46 am »
Reading comprehension, dudes. no offense but y'all seem to lack it. What are you, from Baltimore or something?

What I meant was that if they clinch with Ubaldo on the mound, irony would be in the air. And they did. And it is. So I was right, so right. See?

K8teebug

  • Member
  • Posts: 4119
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #472 on: September 17, 2014, 10:19:18 am »
Irony indeed.  Ubaldo and Tommy Hunter pitching the 9th!

How sweet it is!!!

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #473 on: September 17, 2014, 10:28:47 am »
Reading comprehension, dudes. no offense but y'all seem to lack it. What are you, from Baltimore or something?

What I meant was that if they clinch with Ubaldo on the mound, irony would be in the air. And they did. And it is. So I was right, so right. See?

No.  You said 'With Ubaldo on the mound you may get your wish'.  Meaning the O's would lose.

And you also said 'Would be ironic and yet somehow fitting if they clinched with Ubaldo on the mound'.  Meaning the O's would win.

See?

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28464
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #474 on: September 17, 2014, 11:03:23 am »
Reading comprehension, dudes. no offense but y'all seem to lack it. What are you, from Baltimore or something?

What I meant was that if they clinch with Ubaldo on the mound, irony would be in the air. And they did. And it is. So I was right, so right. See?

No.  You said 'With Ubaldo on the mound you may get your wish'.  Meaning the O's would lose.

And you also said 'Would be ironic and yet somehow fitting if they clinched with Ubaldo on the mound'.  Meaning the O's would win.

See?
That is not at all what I read James Ford's comments to mean.
LVMH

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #475 on: September 17, 2014, 11:11:22 am »
Moving on......

Richard Justice, always a great read:  http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/94383392/orioles-buck-showalter-playoffs-2014

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #476 on: September 17, 2014, 12:34:19 pm »
Congratulations O's fans - that was a long time coming!
27>34

Got Haggis?

  • Member
  • Posts: 2007
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #477 on: September 17, 2014, 01:08:44 pm »
adam jones running around with pies was the best

what was up with champagne goggles

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3288
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #478 on: September 17, 2014, 02:23:40 pm »
adam jones running around with pies was the best

what was up with champagne goggles


That stuff stings.

Guess I'll be seeing the B squad tonight.  Hangovers all around.


James Ford

  • Member
  • Posts: 5620
Re: Orioles....part 2?
« Reply #479 on: September 17, 2014, 02:33:47 pm »
Aside from Jones, Cruz, and Markakis, it seems like the whole starting lineup is a collection of B squadders each night.

adam jones running around with pies was the best

what was up with champagne goggles


That stuff stings.

Guess I'll be seeing the B squad tonight.  Hangovers all around.