Author Topic: Official 930 Supreme Court thread  (Read 30669 times)

Starsky

  • Guest
Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« on: June 23, 2021, 11:55:57 am »
I can believe there is no Supreme Court thread

6-3 conservative majority


https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/23/politics/supreme-court-california-unions/index.html

Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2021, 12:09:50 pm »
So a union leader now has to Pay the corp/owner to come onsite to talk to members?
how is this price determined? 

I'm not sure I  understand this

"The access regulation amounts to simple appropriation of private property," Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. He added that the "access regulation grants labor organizations a right to invade the growers' property. It therefore constitutes a per se physical
slack

Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2021, 12:26:14 pm »
I am glad to see that cheerleaders who use expletives in Snapchat while off campus are protected by 1A

near unanimous, but of course Thomas seems to think cursing is naughty
slack

Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2021, 04:57:47 pm »
I am glad to see that cheerleaders who use expletives in Snapchat while off campus are protected by 1A

near unanimous, but of course Thomas seems to think cursing is naughty
https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1407724307757809669?s=20
ACLU@ACLU
Say it with us:

Fuck school.
Fuck softball.
Fuck cheer.
Fuck everything.

We know our First Amendment rights and we will use them. Get the new Fuck Everything tee today.
slack

Space Freely

  • Member
  • Posts: 9935
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2021, 06:30:25 pm »
Breyer, please retire.

Thomas, please die.

Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2021, 09:22:22 pm »
Breyer, please retire.

Thomas, please die.
That would make a great T-shirt
slack

Starsky

  • Guest
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2021, 10:03:55 am »
Waiting on abortion decision….


Starsky

  • Guest
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2022, 12:44:10 pm »
It’s Ketanji Brown Jackson

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28464
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2022, 01:02:32 pm »
It’s Ketanji Brown Jackson
Vansmack gets passed over YET AGAIN.
LVMH

Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2022, 02:15:35 pm »
It’s Ketanji Brown Jackson
Vansmack gets passed over YET AGAIN.
I didn't realize he was a black female?!
slack

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14626
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2022, 03:06:37 pm »
one of the QOPs concerns about her is she belongs to a private club in DC for Washington elites ::)
T.Rex

Starsky

  • Guest
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2022, 03:17:42 pm »
I imagine she will have a tough time getting confirmed

I can’t wait to hear about Manchin’s concern!

And Susan Collins….


Vommit

Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2022, 03:36:12 pm »
I imagine she will have a tough time getting confirmed

I can’t wait to hear about Manchin’s concern!

And Susan Collins….


Vommit
well we don't need susan, but we do need manchin and sinema...fuck those two are just killing any hope we had
slack

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28464
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2022, 03:57:24 pm »
one of the QOPs concerns about her is she belongs to a private club in DC for Washington elites ::)
A private club Julian went to a party at at like 25.
LVMH