Author Topic: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever  (Read 59849 times)

Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #300 on: October 25, 2004, 05:32:00 pm »
I thought this Steve Earle quote was sorta funny...
 
  But it's much easier for me to support John Kerry than Bill Clinton. Clinton is the only Republican I ever voted for twice."

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #301 on: October 25, 2004, 05:47:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
  Here's a picture Bags will like.   :)

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15221
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #302 on: October 25, 2004, 10:59:00 pm »
Well there is a first time for everything I just cast a TRL vote for the new Eminen vid for "Mosh" with a not so subtle anti Bush and get out the vote message.
 
 Linkage
 
  The video to Eminem's scathing anti-Bush/pro-Vote video is up now at this site. You can also see it at these sites:
 
 Windows Media Player
 
 http://boss.streamos.com/wmedia/interscope/eminem/encore/video/mosh-rev/000_mosh-rev.asx
 
 Real Player
 
 http://boss.streamos.com/real/interscope/eminem/encore/video/mosh-rev/000_mosh-rev.ram
 
 Quicktime
 
 http://movies10.archive.org/3/movies/Mosh2/GNN_Mosh_bb2.mov
 
 or
 
 http://boss.streamos.com/qtime/interscope/eminem/encore/video/mosh-rev/300_mosh-rev.mov
T.Rex

hitman

  • Member
  • Posts: 632
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #303 on: October 27, 2004, 02:03:00 am »
where the hell is Edwards?  what happened to him?  I'm sick and tired of seeing all of the media blitz with Cheney, but nothing of Edwards.  The only thing I've see of Edwards in the past two weeks is a blurb about his wife on Tough Crowd tonight on Comedy Central.  Damnit!

Random Citizen

  • Guest
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #304 on: October 27, 2004, 01:16:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  where the hell is Edwards?  what happened to him?  I'm sick and tired of seeing all of the media blitz with Cheney, but nothing of Edwards.  
He's rounding up the NASCAR voters:
  <img src="http://www.wonkette.com/images/when%20nascar%20moms%20attack.jpg" alt=" - " />

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #305 on: October 27, 2004, 01:18:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  where the hell is Edwards?  what happened to him?  
He's still fixing his hair.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15221
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #306 on: October 27, 2004, 07:52:00 pm »
not only is bush fixin' his hair but he is show us his IQ!
 
  Bush's One Finger Salute to the Nation
T.Rex

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #307 on: October 27, 2004, 08:32:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
  not only is bush fixin' his hair but he is show us his IQ!
POLITICAL POINTS
 
 Secret Weapon for Bush?
 
 By JOHN TIERNEY
 
 Published: October 24, 2004
 
 To Bush-bashers, it may be the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry.
 
 That, at least, is the conclusion of Steve Sailer, a conservative columnist at the Web magazine Vdare.com and a veteran student of presidential I.Q.'s. During the last presidential campaign Mr. Sailer estimated from Mr. Bush's SAT score (1206) that his I.Q. was in the mid-120's, about 10 points lower than Al Gore's.
 
 Mr. Kerry's SAT score is not known, but now Mr. Sailer has done a comparison of the intelligence tests in the candidates' military records. They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations.
 
 Mr. Bush's score on the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test at age 22 again suggests that his I.Q was the mid-120's, putting Mr. Bush in about the 95th percentile of the population, according to Mr. Sailer. Mr. Kerry's I.Q. was about 120, in the 91st percentile, according to Mr. Sailer's extrapolation of his score at age 22 on the Navy Officer Qualification Test.
 
 Linda Gottfredson, an I.Q. expert at the University of Delaware, called it a creditable analysis said she was not surprised at the results or that so many people had assumed that Mr. Kerry was smarter. "People will often be misled into thinking someone is brighter if he says something complicated they can't understand," Professor Gottfredson said.
 
 Many Americans still believe a report that began circulating on the Internet three years ago, and was quoted in "Doonesbury," that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was 91, the lowest of any modern American president. But that report from the non-existent Lovenstein Institute turned out to be a hoax.
 
 You might expect Kerry campaign officials, who have worried that their candidate's intellectual image turns off voters, to quickly rush out a commercial trumpeting these new results, but for some reason they seem to be resisting the temptation.
 
 Upon hearing of their candidate's score, Michael Meehan, a spokesman for the senator, said merely: "The true test is not where you start out in life, but what you do with those God-given talents. John Kerry's 40 years of public service puts him in the top percentile on that measure."
 
 From The New York Times

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #308 on: October 27, 2004, 08:52:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Steve Sailer
That's it!  I've been trying to peg you for months now through all of these political discussions.  You remind me of Steve Sailer!
 
 And I guess I shouldn't be surprised, having just visited isteve.com that many of your recent links and articles are on there....
 
 And yes, I threw up in my mouth a little when I visited the site.
27>34

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #309 on: October 27, 2004, 11:38:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
 That's it!  I've been trying to peg you for months now through all of these political discussions.  You remind me of Steve Sailer!
 
After perusing Mr. Sailer's site, I have come to suspect that you don't intend that comparison as a compliment.

Random Citizen

  • Guest

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #311 on: October 28, 2004, 02:47:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  After perusing Mr. Sailer's site, I have come to suspect that you don't intend that comparison as a compliment.
While I may disagree with your politics GGW, I do find you one of the most well informed on the board.  Sometimes I think you might be misinformed (as I'm sure you do of me), but at least you think, research, and have plenty of knowledge and facts to back it up your opinions.
 
 I think the same of Steve Sailer - he's no idiot.  Racist at times and clearly way to the right, but he does his homework and uses facts to back up his points.  I disagree with just about everything he says, but at least it's presented in a scholarly manner, as opposed to the Religious Right, which I think tends to hide in rhetoric.
 
 A backhanded comment perhaps, or perhaps a backhanded compliment, I'm not sure. Probably both.  It's not like I compared you to Ralph Reed, you know?
27>34

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15221
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #312 on: October 28, 2004, 05:58:00 pm »
Why I can't get enough of Dailykos.com
 
  Busted with hands in the Photoshop Jar
T.Rex

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #313 on: October 29, 2004, 12:36:00 am »

jkeisenh

  • Guest
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #314 on: October 29, 2004, 08:06:00 am »
chimbly can now report to you live from the battleground state of wisconsin.  (chimbly will now stop referring to herself in the third person.)
 
 if i lived here, i'd be looking for last minute trips outta town.  about 2/3 of the tv commercials are political.  every mailbox is stuffed with issue ads-- one for every issue.  every door has been knocked on twice, and nobody answers their phone any more.
 
 people also have moved from political debate to a sort of war like atmosphere-- that whole "you're with us or you're against us" is happening from both sides-- nobody really wants to talk issues anymore.
 
 you'd have to live under a rock to not plan on voting.
 
 off to knock on more doors of people who've heard it before...