Author Topic: What the f is wrong with the President?  (Read 104323 times)

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #315 on: May 13, 2011, 03:05:34 pm »
BTW...thanks for saving us during the Battle of Britain in the Autumn of 1940 when the Luftwaffe was soundly and convincingly beaten....oh wait..you didn't get involved till Dec 1941.

Never mind....

hutch

  • Guest
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #316 on: May 13, 2011, 03:09:22 pm »
BTW...thanks for saving us during the Battle of Britain in the Autumn of 1940 when the Luftwaffe was soundly and convincingly beaten....oh wait..you didn't get involved till Dec 1941.

Never mind....

you need to learn how to read.. i don recall saying the US won every battle for England  but to say that without the US England would have beaten the nazis is poppycock...


its also disingenuous to wholly discount all the aid England was receiving prior to US joining war
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 03:10:55 pm by hutch »

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #317 on: May 13, 2011, 03:09:57 pm »
あなたは琉球を話すだろう

How many Japanese soldiers did British soldiers kill?
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #318 on: May 13, 2011, 03:14:43 pm »
england was desperate! even sending people like somerset maugham to the US to try to rally US public opinion


this is documented fact!

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #319 on: May 13, 2011, 03:15:07 pm »
We won the only battle that mattered:



No wait, this one:

27>34

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #320 on: May 13, 2011, 03:15:44 pm »
あなたは琉球を話すだろう

How many Japanese soldiers did British soldiers kill?

British forces consistently played a secondary but significant role to American forces in the strangling of Japan's trade. The earliest successes were gained by mine laying. The Japanese minesweeping capability was never great, and when confronted with new types of mines they did not adapt quickly. Japanese shipping was driven from the Burmese coast using this type of warfare.

British submarines also operated against Japanese shipping, although later in the war. They were based in Ceylon, Fremantle, Western Australia and finally the Philippines. A major success was the sinking of several Japanese cruisers.

Dunno....ships crew of a Japanese cruiser X several...

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #321 on: May 13, 2011, 03:16:15 pm »
We won the only battle that mattered:



No wait, this one:


both the work of lizard overlords
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #322 on: May 13, 2011, 03:19:50 pm »
British forces consistently played a secondary but significant role to American forces in the strangling of Japan's trade. The earliest successes were gained by mine laying. The Japanese minesweeping capability was never great, and when confronted with new types of mines they did not adapt quickly. Japanese shipping was driven from the Burmese coast using this type of warfare.

British submarines also operated against Japanese shipping, although later in the war. They were based in Ceylon, Fremantle, Western Australia and finally the Philippines. A major success was the sinking of several Japanese cruisers.

Dunno....ships crew of a Japanese cruiser X several...


Navy guys, especially British one's, aren't really soldiers.

So, zero?
27>34

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #323 on: May 13, 2011, 03:27:41 pm »
We won the only battle that mattered:


No wait, this one:



Ah yes....the war that was fought on the Yank side by French mercaneries supported by Spain, the Netherlands and France, and on the British side by Americans loyal to the crown and tens of thousands of black slaves who didn't want to be slaves in America anymore....again I ask, your point is exactly?

DUDE! What conflict has America won when going it alone...Vietn...oh wait, never mind.

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #324 on: May 13, 2011, 03:29:08 pm »
British forces consistently played a secondary but significant role to American forces in the strangling of Japan's trade. The earliest successes were gained by mine laying. The Japanese minesweeping capability was never great, and when confronted with new types of mines they did not adapt quickly. Japanese shipping was driven from the Burmese coast using this type of warfare.

British submarines also operated against Japanese shipping, although later in the war. They were based in Ceylon, Fremantle, Western Australia and finally the Philippines. A major success was the sinking of several Japanese cruisers.

Dunno....ships crew of a Japanese cruiser X several...


Navy guys, especially British one's, aren't really soldiers.

So, zero?

That's because they're SAILORS!!! DUH!

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #325 on: May 13, 2011, 03:37:28 pm »
so zero then
o/\o

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #326 on: May 13, 2011, 03:38:42 pm »
england was desperate! even sending people like somerset maugham to the US to try to rally US public opinion


this is documented fact!


OKAY...FOR THE FUCKING RECORD IT'S BRITAIN...ENGLAND WAS NOT AT WAR WITH GERMANY. IT WAS FUCKING BRITAIN, WHICH CONSISTS OF ENGLAND, SCOTLAND WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND. FOR THE LOVE OF FUCKING GOD DON'T THEY EVEN TEACH YOU THAT IN SCHOOL IN THIS COUNTRY. Saying England was at war with Germany is like saying North Carolina invaded Iraq

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #327 on: May 13, 2011, 03:40:12 pm »
so zero then

So soldiers don't fly planes either so non-soldiers killed over 2400 yanks at Pearl Harbor...kind of embarrassing don't you think?

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #328 on: May 13, 2011, 03:41:33 pm »
no it would be embarrassing if soldiers flew planes rather than aviators
o/\o

hutch

  • Guest
Re: What the f is wrong with the President?
« Reply #329 on: May 13, 2011, 03:53:26 pm »
england was desperate! even sending people like somerset maugham to the US to try to rally US public opinion


this is documented fact!


OKAY...FOR THE FUCKING RECORD IT'S BRITAIN...ENGLAND WAS NOT AT WAR WITH GERMANY. IT WAS FUCKING BRITAIN, WHICH CONSISTS OF ENGLAND, SCOTLAND WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND. FOR THE LOVE OF FUCKING GOD DON'T THEY EVEN TEACH YOU THAT IN SCHOOL IN THIS COUNTRY. Saying England was at war with Germany is like saying North Carolina invaded Iraq


england was desperate


way to avoid the point though..