Author Topic: Twitter thread  (Read 237912 times)

Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #750 on: March 18, 2022, 11:11:35 am »
^that was actually quite a fascinating read from a source that I wouldn't expect it from

this one made me spit my coffee out
Due to the pricing by the word in telegrams, Caldwell didn't add "what the fuck, what the fucking fuck". Plus, he didn't really need to say that, because what the fuck, what the fucking fuck.
slack

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15208
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #751 on: March 23, 2022, 05:42:46 am »
A thread of product descriptions from a surplus store in the Twin Cities area

https://twitter.com/enfysbook/status/1506018730412687363?s=21
T.Rex

Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #752 on: March 24, 2022, 04:40:15 pm »
@fact
Homosexuality was still classified as an illness in Sweden in 1979. Swedes protested by calling in sick to work saying they felt gay
slack

Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #753 on: April 01, 2022, 12:34:32 pm »
slack

GAY,GUY

  • Guest
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #754 on: April 05, 2022, 01:13:07 pm »
Adam Kinzinger just posted a video.

Damn, he's 🔥 as fuck.

Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #755 on: April 05, 2022, 03:06:13 pm »
slack

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #756 on: April 05, 2022, 04:30:44 pm »
Adam Kinzinger just posted a video.

Damn, he's 🔥 as fuck.

which one?  he's posted a bunch of them recently... https://twitter.com/AdamKinzinger
<sig>

GAY,GUY

  • Guest
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #757 on: April 05, 2022, 04:35:53 pm »
Adam Kinzinger just posted a video.

Damn, he's 🔥 as fuck.

which one?  he's posted a bunch of them recently... https://twitter.com/AdamKinzinger

The one with this wording above it:

 "Instead of a tweet thread about the unseriousness of some members of Congress in this serious time, I just decided to tell you on video:"

Two words . . . 'dem arms.

Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #758 on: April 10, 2022, 08:09:23 am »
slack

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5379
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #759 on: April 10, 2022, 12:19:47 pm »


Too bad the QR isn't sharp enough in this pic to use.
😐 🎶

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #760 on: April 11, 2022, 12:56:02 am »
Too bad the QR isn't sharp enough in this pic to use.

my phone picked it up.  the resulting link wasn't to Rick, rather it played the twitter video (which, i guess, included Rick...)
<sig>

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10292
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #761 on: April 20, 2022, 12:13:47 pm »
Same.

A lot of these new followers are gonna be real confused when they find out this is a burrito appreciation account.
https://twitter.com/scottfaubs/status/1516780558377906183

Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #762 on: April 20, 2022, 12:30:57 pm »
^now you are confirming all of Julep's stereotype of you
slack

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15208
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #763 on: April 20, 2022, 01:02:35 pm »
^now you are confirming all of Julep's stereotype of you

for some reason this typo made me think of the Grant Lee Buffalo song "Jupiter and Teardrop"... NP: some GLB...
T.Rex

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Twitter thread
« Reply #764 on: April 21, 2022, 05:10:19 pm »
@TheOnion
The Onion has been banned on Twitter, follow us on Twitter for more updates.

https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/1517169751704981506
27>34