Author Topic: iphone  (Read 395638 times)

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: iphone
« Reply #105 on: March 19, 2009, 03:33:02 pm »
if its the latter i wouldnt have bought the software in the first place
o/\o

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: iphone
« Reply #106 on: March 19, 2009, 04:41:59 pm »
Sweetcell, it all come down to how you look at it.

When a software company releases a bug patch, or adds an obvious feature that should have been there in the first place, are you overwhelmed with gratitude and admiration that they did something about it, or are you glad but still slightly annoyed that they sold you an incomplete piece of software in the first place?

If it's the former, you too may be a fanboi.

i doubt i qualify as a fanboi - wouldn't i have to own one?   

who here is overwhelmed with gratitude and admiration?  i think my post was clearly in the "glad but still slightly annoyed" category, not that i have a horse in this race.  i'm sure the apple message boards are full of "praise be to Jobs for copy and paste" adirations, but that's the fanboi community.  apple can't take responsibility for them.

you still haven't explained how that image conveys the "amazing chutzpah of showing off "Cut, copy, and paste" as if it's a brilliant, cutting edge idea that they just came up with"?  i didn't watch the presentation so maybe the speaker did flaunt it like something new, but in that image i see someone pointing out a new few feature on their hardware - nothing more.  there is no "we invented this" banner or other messianic proclamation.  should they have ignored this new feature and not talked about it at all?  that extreme seems to be the only one that would make you happy... and i think that's unrealistic.  that's all.

that the iphone didn't have this capability from the outset is lame, but let's not mix topics.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2009, 04:45:55 pm by sweetcell »
<sig>

Jaguar

  • Member
  • Posts: 3869
    • Air Atlantic Underground
Re: iphone
« Reply #107 on: March 19, 2009, 04:47:38 pm »
When a software company releases a bug patch, or adds an obvious feature that should have been there in the first place, are you overwhelmed with gratitude and admiration that they did something about it, or are you glad but still slightly annoyed that they sold you an incomplete piece of software in the first place?

That all falls under what I have always called a MacHandicap.
#609

Jaguar

  • Member
  • Posts: 3869
    • Air Atlantic Underground
Re: iphone
« Reply #108 on: March 19, 2009, 09:57:51 pm »
Have no idea if this works all that well or what. Just happened to see this article and thought I'd share it here. To be honest, I didn't even read it since I do not own an iPod nor an iPhone. Has anyone tried this and what are your thoughts on this?

Review: How an iPod can be a poor man's iPhone

(Sorry if this has or something like this has been posted already as I tend to glide past any kind of iProducts info in here.)
#609

Chip Chanko

  • Member
  • Posts: 742
Re: iphone
« Reply #109 on: March 20, 2009, 12:27:32 am »
iPeeDaily

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #110 on: March 26, 2009, 07:52:45 pm »
supposedly the slingbox player app should be out shorty too:
http://www.slingmedia.com/go/iphone
i might have to get a slingbox now

This was submitted to the App store today and awaits approval.  If you promise not to watch any Skinimax on it I'm sure they'll approve it in no time.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #111 on: April 02, 2009, 12:15:45 pm »
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: iphone
« Reply #112 on: April 02, 2009, 12:43:14 pm »
congrats to the writer for not ending it with in this economy

but thats pretty terrible none the less
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #113 on: April 03, 2009, 12:48:58 pm »
Will it be included in iphone 3.0? 

Yes, but it will require some agreement with your phone provider and Apple has said they will not step in and force the service provider to take any steps. As the iPhone is exclusive, I wouldn't look for much competition to add this to the existing plan at no charge.

Well, as predicted:

at&t Tweaks Wireless Terms of Service to Forbid Video Streaming, File Sharing, and Data Tethering

I guess that means no Slingbox or tethering on the iPhone.
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: iphone
« Reply #114 on: April 03, 2009, 12:54:39 pm »
like the day after they come up with the app too. great
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #115 on: April 04, 2009, 07:14:26 pm »
like the day after they come up with the app too. great

Well, because vansmack pointed out to us all that was wrong with that decision, we take it back.  Our bad.
27>34

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: iphone
« Reply #116 on: April 15, 2009, 08:10:10 pm »
at&t wants to extend its exclusivity agreement through 2011.
OU812

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: iphone
« Reply #117 on: April 15, 2009, 08:42:16 pm »
at&t wants to extend its exclusivity agreement through 2011.

Of course they do.  It's done nothing but bring more and more subscribers.

It's just bad for everybody else not named at&t (and arguably Apple).
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: iphone
« Reply #118 on: April 28, 2009, 03:54:17 pm »
<sig>

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: iphone
« Reply #119 on: April 28, 2009, 03:58:21 pm »
at&t wants to extend its exclusivity agreement through 2011.

Verizon Said to Be in Talks for the iPhone
yeah, i saw that. . .if it comes to verizon, i certainly would be interested, since i would likely be in need of an upgrade by then. . .
OU812