Actually Ratbastard, most of us disagree with your number two point. Hypothetical, imaginary offense taken by a theoretical person somewhere in no way equates to actual offense taken by tens of millions of real people. You keep saying this insane thing as though if you repeat it enough times it's true, but it's not. It's illogical.
It's sort of like going "anyone could hypothetically commit a murder so why should we prosecute people who actually did commit murders?"
It has nothing to do with theory. Not even close. It is an absolute fact that a huge proportion of NBA players are black. It is an absolute fact that the largest anti-black group in this country's history was/is the KKK. It is an absolute fact that the leader of the KKK is called the grand wizard. There is nothing imaginary about any of that.
its theoretical because you fail to show one example of anyone ACTUALLY SAYING they're offended. No NBA player is anti-Wizards name publicly. I can find no evidence thru google searches of anyone but you -- who says yourself that you're not offended -- making a connection between the name and the KKK. On the other hand, there is massive, apparent dislike of the Redskins name.
This is called strawman-ism, and it's a trade you and atomic apply regularly. Instead of arguing the actual merits of an issue (in this case, the suitability of the NFL teams name) you conflate that issue with a make believe issue (the idea that if a name offends on person, it's just as bad as if it offends 100million, a thought no one on here believes despite how liberal PC you purport us to be) that no one actually argues (a strawman), in hopes of making the actual topic being discussed look foolish by association. Unfortunately, this isn't Fox News, so none of us fall for that.
