Author Topic: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07  (Read 60597 times)

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #210 on: October 10, 2007, 05:10:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
 so we've finally stopped the Coldplay comparison?
 
 thank god!
Spoke too soon! ^^

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #211 on: October 10, 2007, 05:11:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Julian, good manners AFICIONADO:
   
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
 so we've finally stopped the Coldplay comparison?
 
 thank god!
Spoke to soon! ^^ [/b]
i hate you.
 
 and you better stop posting or this thread will be longer than the pumpkins thread, and you dont want that do you?
 
 well, at least the Pumpkins thread was first!  :)

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #212 on: October 10, 2007, 05:13:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
 
 well, at least the Pumpkins thread was first!   :)  
Well, yeah, but Radiohead is the only thread that matters!

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #213 on: October 10, 2007, 05:16:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   
Quote
Originally posted by callat703:
  I think Radiohead is as close as we'll ever get to a band like the Beatles, where the world essentially stopped when they put out a new album.  Everybody took an hour and listened to it to see what they thought.  Everybody is paying attention.
 
Nothing personal, but that's just such a stupid fucking statement (not that you are the only one to make it).  
 
 The Beatles were not only a massive cultural phenomenon (to which Radiohead does not even come approach), but they also shaped the way other bands recorded and produced their albums.  Other than Muse - who are a joke - and perhaps Clinic, what other bands have really been shaped by the way Radiohead makes music.
 
 If you want a good analogy, try Lemmy's take on Motorhead: "We may not have had a huge amount of fans, but those that we had would murder for us.  And that's saying a lot." [/b]
Because the Director's post is so long that I haven't had time to properly look at it or try and respond...I will try and get back to that.
 
 Great Lemmy quote.
 
 I have no way of backing this statement up with fact, apart from saying you could troll MySpace pages and look at that little "influence" section, but I think you'd find a HUGE number of musicians who have been influenced and shaped by the way Radiohead has chosen to make records and define themselves as artists.  I honestly do think that they have a level of artistic influence that justifies a Beatles comparison.
 
 Please also note I have never said that Radiohead is as influential as the Beatles, or as important as the Beatles.  My direct point was:
 
 "I think Radiohead is as close as we'll ever get to a band like the Beatles, where the world essentially stopped when they put out a new album. Everybody took an hour and listened to it to see what they thought. Everybody is paying attention."
 
 I still don't think this is untrue.  No, its not the same as it was for the Beatles - but I do think Radiohead proves to be the best comparison.

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #214 on: October 10, 2007, 05:20:00 pm »
Quick point for the Director - I'll rescind my speculation that Radiohead could match U2 in ticket sales.  You're certainly correct on that point.
 
 But I'm not ready to concede on those other points yet...
 
 And you know, with the exception of Brian Wallace, I have yet to treat any of these discussions with some of the vitriol that you all seem to.  It isn't that hard to disagree and still be polite.

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #215 on: October 10, 2007, 05:24:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by callat703:
 It isn't that hard to disagree and still be polite.
I have pure battery acid running through my veins! I spit alkaline and alcohol! I sweat lighter fluid! And you don't even want to know what my ejaculate consists of!

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #216 on: October 10, 2007, 05:50:00 pm »
I haven't read all 200 posts, but I haven't seen anyone mention Wilco.  YHF was a free release that got coverage in all the big press and, the album itself was a huge critical darling.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #217 on: October 10, 2007, 05:59:00 pm »
Sorry, I fell asleep listening to the new Radiohead album.  What were we talking about again?
27>34

TheDirector217

  • Member
  • Posts: 999
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #218 on: October 10, 2007, 08:03:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
  and would everyone quit talking about fucking concert sales = musical talent!!!!!!!!!!!
 
   ITS
 
   NOT
 
   RELEVANT
 
You made it so.  You said earlier that Radiohead is AND I QUOTE, " . . . the best fucking band in the world."  Fine.  As a man, it is your God-given fucking right to believe that.  Believe it.  Just remember, you can't get a chick pregnant standing up as well.  
 
 Seriously, had you stopped there I have no issues with that.  703's comments were completely erroneous, though. But you chose to concur.  Don't take my word for it.  Here:
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
   
Quote
Originally posted by callat703:
   See, I disagree with you.  I would contend that Radiohead is the biggest band in the world.
I agree. wholeheartedly. [/b]
I sure didn't post that.  And my name is The Director - not David Blaine.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Julian, good manners AFICIONADO:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Other than Muse - who are a joke - and perhaps Clinic, what other bands have really been shaped by the way Radiohead makes music?
Coldplay. [/b]
I file that under wrong. Please note below quote by none other than Chris Martin, frontman of said band who whines in front of a piano & has a child named after a fruit:
 
 
 I don't buy weekend tickets to Ireland and hang out in front of their gates, but U2 are the only band whose entire catalog I know by heart. The first song on The Unforgettable Fire, "A Sort of Homecoming," I know backward and forward -- it's so rousing, brilliant and beautiful. It's one of the first songs I played to my unborn baby.
 The first U2 album I ever heard was Achtung Baby. It was 1991, and I was fourteen years old. Before that, I didn't even know what albums were. From that point, I worked backward -- every six months, I'd get to buy a new U2 album. The sound they pioneered -- the driving bass and drums underneath and those ethereal, effects-laden guitar tracks floating out from above -- was nothing that had been heard before. They may be the only good anthemic rock band ever. Certainly they're the best.
 
 What I love most about U2 is that the band is more important than any of their songs or albums. I love that they're best mates and have an integral role in one another's lives as friends. I love the way that they're not interchangeable -- if Larry Mullen Jr. wants to go scuba diving for a week, the rest of the band can't do a thing. U2 -- like Coldplay -- maintain that all songs that appear on their albums are credited to the band. And they are the only band that's been around for twenty years with no member changes and no big splits.
 
 It's amazing that the biggest band in the world has so much integrity and passion in their music. Our society is thoroughly screwed, fame is a ridiculous waste of time, and celebrity culture is disgusting. There are only a few people around brave enough to talk out against it, who use their fame in a good way. And every time I try, I feel like an idiot, because I see Bono actually getting things achieved. While everyone else is swearing at George Bush, Bono is the one who rubs Bush's back and gets a billion dollars for Africa. People can be so cynical -- they don't like do-gooders -- but Bono's attitude is, "I don't care what anybody thinks, I'm going to speak out." He's accomplished so much with Greenpeace, in Sarajevo, at the concert to shut down the Sellafield nuclear plant, and he still runs the gantlet. When the time came for Coldplay to think about fair trade, we took his lead to speak out regardless of what anyone may think. That's what we've learned from U2: You have to be brave enough to be yourself.
 
 - Chris Martin, Lead Singer Of U2 Tribute Band Minus Guitars Plus Piano - Coldplay (another band that sells far more than Radiohead)
 
 
 Back to Sonick.  Comb over my statements.  Sales of tickets & records will never speak to Radiohead's place in history.  That e-avalanche occured because of you agreement they're the biggest band out.  As I said, they are true artists & future legends.  But for you & 703 to say they are the biggest band in the world is completely erroneous.  Also, drawing a parallel between The Pixies & Velvet Underground with Radiohead in terms of influence is off as well.  Pixies & Velvet were special & earned a place in rock's pantheon, in the fact they:
 
 1) Were waaay ahead of their time, and had MANY bands emulate them.  i.e. The Pixies quiet-LOUD-quiet song format (Nirvana, anyone?)
 
 2) Those 2 bands sold very few units, but the ones that did buy them pretty much all went out & started a band.
 
 Radiohead has their own lane, I will concede, & I respect that to the utmost but their sphere of influence does not stretch nearly that far.  They've been making "Fuck You" albums for years now, & only get a pass on that because of Pablo, Bends, & OK. Remember, that's the same shit that sunk R.E.M.'s boat post-New Adventures In Hi-Fi.  They went from (arguably) best band out to "Who gives a fuck?", which I'm quite sure Radiohead knew hence "genius" marketing/distribution campaign.  Credit though, cause my dissertation length posts are proof it's working.
 
 That's all for now, cause I personally am quite tired of talking about Radiohead.  I'll give their new album a chance.  Again.  Before I decide if their new album's yet another audio equivalent of getting first date head without a swallow (disappointing & unmemorable).  
 
 
 Again.    :D

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #219 on: October 10, 2007, 09:54:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by TheDirector217:
 
 Back to Sonick.  Comb over my statements.  Sales of tickets & records will never speak to Radiohead's place in history.  That e-avalanche occured because of you agreement they're the biggest band out.  
ahh, see but because you only chose to read some of my posts and not all is why you are feeling this way.
 
  once vansmack responded to the biggest band comment, i said that ...wait let me quote
 
 "well, thats what i am saying, i think "bigger" has more to do with album sales, commercials, merchandising sales or concert ticket sales.
 
 
 but to be honest using "big" to describe a band isnt something i would ever really do."
 
   heres 2 points, bro
 
  1) i wouldnt use the word "Big" because i dont think the word "Big" addequately describes the goal of any artist, nor is it really a tangible thing....just something you can argue about, and some bands are bigger than others for different reasons, yadda yadda yadda, so big, is too vague.  but since someone already said it, and they are , to me, better than every band who ever plugged in an instrument...i agreed.
 
  2) did you see the "i think" in that quote.
 
   
 
 this whole thing goes back to opinion, not fact, there are not "big band" stats.....so for you to call my and calla703's opinions "completely erroneous" ....well, is just completely erroenous.
 
  dont geek out on me man, my favourite band just ripped out a new record, and imma be happy about it and say that Thom Yorke could kick John Lennon's ass.....and you can play with Bono.  
 
   but remember, next time U2 releases another album, or Ipod commercial, whichever comes first, i'll be the first to piss on the parade   :)

Brian_Wallace

  • Member
  • Posts: 1484
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #220 on: October 11, 2007, 08:34:00 am »
U2...Radiohead...Smashing Pumpkins.  Y'all need to pull your heads out of your asses.  They're all too precious.
 
 I'm making a note to never take anything "Le Sonick" and "Call at 703" say seriously ever again.  You are SO drinking the Kool-Aid with Radiohead.
 
 They're just dull, now.  They make masturbatory, self-indulgent, BORING music that only over-educated, under-employed thirty-somethings who wear "ironic" eyewear (and t-shirts), treasure their Transformers from their childhoods and can't throw a football to save their lives like.  Do both of you live in New York City and have a blog?  Oh, I forgot.  Washington D.C. is the East Coast New York City.  I mean, if you think what they're doing now is more creative and original than what, say, the Flaming Lips or the Super Furry Animals are doing, you are clearly mistaken.
 
 Hey, if Radiohead want to become the British Sonic Youth, more power to 'em.  But just know that no one under the age of 17 cares what Radiohead does.
 
 Brian

Bombay Chutney

  • Member
  • Posts: 3956
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #221 on: October 11, 2007, 08:41:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by le sonick:
  there are not "big band" stats.....so for you to call my and calla703's opinions "completely erroneous" ....well, is just completely erroenous.
Well...Surely some things can be used as a gauge.    You can't claim that someone is the "biggest band in the world", then completely discount things like record sales, ticket sales, public recognition, etc.  According to callat703, those things are irrelevant.  Those may not be absolute, determining factors, but they need to be taken into consideration.
 
 I think some folks are underestimating Radiohead's draw, but others are a bit over-the-top in how they think the rest of the world views them.  
 
 Biggest band in the world?  To your fellow Radiohead fans maybe - but not to most people.  The world stopped yesterday while everyone took an hour to listen?  Ummm....no.  It's grandiose statements like that that make people roll their eyes and discount the rest of your arguments.
 
 "Biggest" and "best/favorite" are completely different things.  "Biggest" is at least partially quantifiable. "Best/Favorite" is 100% opinion.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #222 on: October 11, 2007, 08:49:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Brian Wallace:
 
 I'm making a note to never take anything "Le Sonick" and "Call at 703" say seriously ever again.  You are SO drinking the Kool-Aid with Radiohead.
 
so we're finally on even ground then i suppose!

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #223 on: October 11, 2007, 08:56:00 am »
can everyone please go back and read my statement.
 
 i agreed with callat703 about Radiohead being the biggest band, then made this statement:
 
 "i think "bigger" has more to do with album sales, commercials, merchandising sales or concert ticket sales.......using "big" to describe a band isnt something i would ever really do."
 
 
    I backed out of calling Radiohead (or any other band for that matter) big almost immediately after it was said.
 
     jeeeesuss.  it like selective reading time around here.

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6169
Re: HOLY CRAP - NEW RADIOHEAD ALBUM 10/10/07
« Reply #224 on: October 11, 2007, 09:06:00 am »
Uh, have you looked at a map recently?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Brian Wallace:
 Oh, I forgot.  Washington D.C. is the East Coast New York City.