Author Topic: The 2020 thread....  (Read 456724 times)

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1335 on: January 03, 2020, 01:26:36 pm »
and the retires continue on the R side

Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) announced Friday he won't seek re-election in 2020
the 25th Republican to announce he will not run for re-election this cycle.


although almost no chance this going dem
President Trump won Roe's district in 2016 by a nearly 57-point margin.
    Roe's congressional seat has been held by a Republican since 1881.
slack

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28517
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1336 on: January 03, 2020, 01:32:42 pm »
and the retires continue on the R side

Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) announced Friday he won't seek re-election in 2020
the 25th Republican to announce he will not run for re-election this cycle.


although almost no chance this going dem
President Trump won Roe's district in 2016 by a nearly 57-point margin.
    Roe's congressional seat has been held by a Republican since 1881.

His constituents were probably recently informed that Roe was the pro-abortion side, not Wade.
LVMH

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1337 on: January 03, 2020, 04:43:57 pm »
His constituents were probably recently informed that Roe was the pro-abortion side, not Wade.
hmm always thought it was Norma McCorvey ;)
slack

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28517
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1338 on: January 03, 2020, 04:54:23 pm »
His constituents were probably recently informed that Roe was the pro-abortion side, not Wade.
hmm always thought it was Norma McCorvey ;)
The Benedict Arnold of the abortion rights movement.
LVMH

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1339 on: January 03, 2020, 05:19:13 pm »
His constituents were probably recently informed that Roe was the pro-abortion side, not Wade.
hmm always thought it was Norma McCorvey ;)
The Benedict Arnold of the abortion rights movement.
yep, story/stance changed a lot
it's not inaccurate that she was a pawn in the movement...
slack

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1340 on: January 06, 2020, 12:35:53 pm »
hmm this future/present thing may have impacted your decision making process...

Julián Castro endorses Elizabeth Warren for president


And why the fuck not....Lincoln Chafee files to run for president as a Libertarian
he may pull some of the old school GOP'ers who were really libertarians the whole time
« Last Edit: January 06, 2020, 12:41:30 pm by At the direction of... ıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|ll »
slack

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1341 on: January 06, 2020, 02:52:49 pm »
Nobody is going to pull anybody from Trump.....every scintilla of evidence points to that...Jesus Christ could run and every Republican (including “evangelicals”) would vote Trump

Good for Julian..looks like a desperate attempt by Warren to stop/revert the slide ...otherwise she would have kept the endorsement in her back pocket until a week before Iowa


Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1342 on: January 07, 2020, 03:42:26 pm »
Bloomberg drops $10 mil on a 60 second superbowl ad
slack

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1343 on: January 07, 2020, 03:47:17 pm »
Good for Bloomberg


I like him...always have

It’s a horribly weak field with koo koo for Cocoa Puffs (heart attack) Bernie, ga ga Biden, Pocahontas and the guy from Mad magazine

I would happily vote for Bloomberg

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1344 on: January 07, 2020, 03:58:47 pm »
Good for Bloomberg
He's got an interesting strategy to avoid the first 4, no debates and just focus on super Tuesday
I do like the Mayor and most things he stands for
I do think he would have no problem in a face to face debate with Trump...as I fear our current front runners will crumble
slack

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1345 on: January 07, 2020, 04:27:15 pm »
Bloomberg drops $10 mil on a 60 second superbowl ad
not to get outdone
President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign is planning to drop $10 million to advertise during the Super Bowl


I'm surprised he didn't buy 4 ads
guy is soo thin skinned it's unbelievable


Hmmm...so not sure of the order of events...
"The biggest point is getting under Trump's skin," Bloomberg spokesman says of buying a $10 million Super Bowl ad
« Last Edit: January 07, 2020, 04:36:37 pm by If it happens, it happens...ıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|ll »
slack

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1346 on: January 08, 2020, 08:47:35 pm »
this is good news towards getting the senate blue
Poll: Democrat Mark Kelly leads incumbent McSally in Arizona Senate race
slack

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1347 on: January 09, 2020, 10:19:33 am »
wow, this is quite a haul
ActBlue, an online fundraising platform for Democrats and progressive groups, pulled in $1.05 billion in campaign contributions for the party’s candidates and causes in 2019.


although I think some of this went almost directly to the Dem Campaigns who also claim this on their balance sheet
wonder how much of that is small money donations


update- The average contribution was $30.50.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2020, 10:46:37 am by All is well! ...ıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|ll »
slack

Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1348 on: January 09, 2020, 12:24:14 pm »
Can someone tell me why the Dems keep with this Primary schedule

1. caucus, while on paper sound like a great idea...are just a disaster
2. Iowa, NH, SC, NV as the first four...yikes
3. I think the Dems should be doing ranked choice voting in primaries

saw this and it depresses me

@HoarseWisperer
In Iowa, approximately 30% of registered voters are Democrats.
Of that number, approximately 15% participate in caucuses.

4.5% of Iowa’s population participates in the Dem caucus.

Hardly representative of the state let alone the country.


what world does it make sense that this should be the Dem's first primary?
slack

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21446
  • I don't belong here.
Re: The 2020 thread....
« Reply #1349 on: January 09, 2020, 02:31:47 pm »
Can someone tell me why the Dems keep with this Primary schedule

1. caucus, while on paper sound like a great idea...are just a disaster
2. Iowa, NH, SC, NV as the first four...yikes
3. I think the Dems should be doing ranked choice voting in primaries

saw this and it depresses me

@HoarseWisperer
In Iowa, approximately 30% of registered voters are Democrats.
Of that number, approximately 15% participate in caucuses.

4.5% of Iowa’s population participates in the Dem caucus.

Hardly representative of the state let alone the country.


what world does it make sense that this should be the Dem's first primary?


Julian from the Past complained exactly about this when he suspended his campaign.  he was banking on capturing a large portion of the non-white vote, yet the launchpads for the nomination - iowa and new hamphire - are two of the whitest states in the union.  bloomberg seems to think he can pull it off without those first 2 states (actually first 4 states, since he isn't on those ballots) but realistically no one has ever won the nom without being first or second in the first 2 states.
<sig>