I didn’t say it’s not important but what are you arguing? We would be better off with another Alito? John Roberts has sided with liberals on some big decisions that have impacted millions positively from health care to DACA to huge acronym rights
Just recognize it and don’t be so immature: “Oh it’s not exactly what I want on every ruling so he sucks!”
No argument from me that Roberts is the new center of the Court. But that center is to the right of where it was when Kennedy was on the Court, let alone Rehnquist. The Republican party wasn't as crazy during Bush's term as it is now and I disagree that the only choices were Alito 2.0 or Roberts. Plus, Bush was President so he could make any choice he wanted to. Why would I applaud him for Roberts, who has been generally terrible.
More importantly though, Roberts has ruled with the liberals on some relatively unimportant cases and on the big system stuff he consistently sides with the Conservatives. And his opinions suggest he's willing to take some major steps like unwinding the non-delegation doctrine. DACA is important, but he ruled on a technicality of administrative procedure, not on anything durable. Same thing with the Census. I don't take a lot of heart in that or have faith in Robert's willingness to stand up to the fascist state.