Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
yet. . .what was it you said earlier. . oh yeah. . .
Originally posted by sweetcell:
thanks for not addressing the issue, once again:
[/b]
At least Sweetcell got it....
My point was that the premise of the Op ed, notice it's not an article of news, which only cites one person with little quips from others, none of which are a full sentence, was that there were negotiations underway for troop withdrawl with the current administration, and that is a contention I don't believe to be true.
Therefore, if there is no negotitation underway, why would the next President ask that no decision be made until the next administration?