Author Topic: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever  (Read 59871 times)

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #75 on: October 01, 2004, 12:43:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Arthwys:
  I think i'm gonna do a bit of research on this....
Arthwys...Son of GGW.

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #76 on: October 01, 2004, 12:43:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
 
 
 I won't be voting Nader because I don't think he'd make a very good president.  Last time I saw him as a decent man, and voted for him because I believed it was the right thing to do.  Morals are one thing, and a very good thing, but that's not the only aspect of a leader.
 
that is pretty much my same reasoning on why I wont be voting for him this time and why I did vote for him last time, not that either of our votes matter as DC residents

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #77 on: October 01, 2004, 12:44:00 pm »
Just because the criticism isn't new does not mean it is valid.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by pollard:
  Its hardly a new criticism that the Iraq war smacks of Empire building.  If you were one to believe the U.S. is occupying Iraq, then you are probably one who could believe it is empire building
 
 empire - a group of countries ruled by just one of them

grotty

  • Guest
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #78 on: October 01, 2004, 12:44:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pollard:
  Its hardly a new criticism that the Iraq war smacks of Empire building.  If you were one to believe the U.S. is occupying Iraq, then you are probably one who could believe it is empire building
 
 empire - a group of countries ruled by just one of them
All we hear about is the cost of the Iraqi war in terms of $$ and American lives, but the real 'cost' of this war and the way it's being managed won't be felt for years. Not until an entire generation of American-hating militant-leaning Middle Easterners come of age.
 
 Bush will be long gone by then though. Someone else can deal with that mess.   :roll:

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #79 on: October 01, 2004, 12:45:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Just because the criticism isn't new does not mean it is valid.
 
 
I was not saying it was valid, your response seemed like one of surprise that the idea was even there

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #80 on: October 01, 2004, 12:46:00 pm »
Testify brother.
 
 Thirsty is a closet Republican.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
 To further make you all think I'm a loon, I believe government should be far more local than it already is.  Put more trust in States, hell, Counties even.    
 

grotty

  • Guest
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #81 on: October 01, 2004, 12:47:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
  theocratic beliefs?  
<img src="http://www.allhatnocattle.net/name%20that2.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
 
 The Bush Theocracy
 
 By Beto Segovia
 
 America's president, George W. Bush, God bless him and God help the world, talks with God before he makes important decisions. Needless to say, based on his record, he doesn't fully understands the Divine.  What he does understand, however, is fundamentalist Christianity. In Houston, at a recent interview, he stated that the doors of Heaven are only open to those who accept Jesus Christ, Christianity, as their religion. So much for Muslims, Hindus, Jews and, of course, the agnostics.
 
 The Republican party is now infested with the descendants of the KKK who inhabit the bible belt along the southern states of America. Christian right fundamentalists - Robertson, Buchanan, Ashcroft - regardless of their actual residence are the controlling leadership of the Republican party. By capturing and controlling the party they have set the road map that guides the Republican platform, which is essentially, anti-abortion, anti-stem research, anti same couple unions ... anti United Nations, pro imperialistic, pro unilateral international policies ... additionally, supremacy of government over its citizens.
 
 The Christian right Republican party has become a theocracy with Bush as its 'Pope' and Ashcroft as its enforcer. Not much unlike the regimes that the 'Pope' is seeking to replace. Preaching Christianity, democracy and patriotism to camouflage the invasion of human rights and civil liberties, unwarranted military intervention and civilian casualties, the theocracy sells its agenda to the gullible, trusting American who regrettably is guided by bullet sounds, slogans and the appeal to God and Country.
 
 What is most perplexing about the new Republican Party is its dramatic departure from the policies and values that were the linchpin of the faithful: States rights, individual rights and liberties, separation of church and state, non-intervention in foreign entanglements, limitation of Federal government interference with the states and citizens ... The Theocracy now wants to override the Constitutional right of the States to legislate on internal welfare issues, such as same sex unions; wants to invade the right of its citizens to decide on issues such as abortion by imposing government moral values on the individual, is funding 'faith' based groups to implement the above and to form political cells to support the theocracy and its candidates.
 
 It's a sorry state of affairs for the once noble Republican Party. But worse, it's a calamity to Americans and the international community. God help us!

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #82 on: October 01, 2004, 12:48:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by grotty:
 but the real 'cost' of this war and the way it's being managed won't be felt for years. Not until an entire generation of American-hating militant-leaning Middle Easterners come of age.
 
 Bush will be long gone by then though. Someone else can deal with that mess.    :roll:  
applause applause applause

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #83 on: October 01, 2004, 12:48:00 pm »
Markie is usually a bit smarter than the average person who trots out the empire accusation.  The surprise is that he would make it.  I hoped he would explain the thought process behind that belief.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by pollard:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Just because the criticism isn't new does not mean it is valid.
 
 
I was not saying it was valid, your response seemed like one of surprise that the idea was even there [/b]

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #84 on: October 01, 2004, 12:52:00 pm »
Right.  Because before Bush took office, we were all sitting around sharing the hooka and singing Kumbayaa.
 
 World Trade Center 1993
 African Embassies 1998
 Khobar Towers 1996
 
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by grotty:
 All we hear about is the cost of the Iraqi war in terms of $$ and American lives, but the real 'cost' of this war and the way it's being managed won't be felt for years. Not until an entire generation of American-hating militant-leaning Middle Easterners come of age.
 
 Bush will be long gone by then though. Someone else can deal with that mess.    :roll:  

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #85 on: October 01, 2004, 12:52:00 pm »
That was just my stump speech.  I'll be shaking hands outside of the Au Bon Pain later on to rake in some liberals.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Testify brother.
 
 Thirsty is a closet Republican.

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #86 on: October 01, 2004, 12:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I find it hard to believe there are Republicans who are actually into indie rock.
I find it even harder to believe that there are Democrats who are into country music.  :D

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #87 on: October 01, 2004, 12:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Markie is usually a bit smarter than the average person who trots out the empire accusation.  The surprise is that he would make it.  I hoped he would explain the thought process behind that belief.
 
well i wont speak for Markie, but even just by looking at it from the point of view of a non-american who does not support the war, the US went in to a nation and toppled its government with little support from the rest of the world and was already wielding influence around the globe with little concern for who it affected, sounds like a little empire in waiting to me, it is not that far of a reach if you already have little respect or trust in the American government

grotty

  • Guest
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #88 on: October 01, 2004, 12:54:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Right.  Because before Bush took office, we were all sitting around sharing the hooka and singing Kumbayaa.
 
 World Trade Center 1993
 African Embassies 1998
 Khobar Towers 1996
 
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by grotty:
 All we hear about is the cost of the Iraqi war in terms of $$ and American lives, but the real 'cost' of this war and the way it's being managed won't be felt for years. Not until an entire generation of American-hating militant-leaning Middle Easterners come of age.
 
 Bush will be long gone by then though. Someone else can deal with that mess.     :roll:  
[/b]
Good point, but I think - "You ain't seen nothin' yet."

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Frankensteins monster vs Someone who is not very clever
« Reply #89 on: October 01, 2004, 12:55:00 pm »
Sharing meth with Fundamentalists singing BTO?  Wow!
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by grotty:
 Good point, but I think - "You ain't seen nothin' yet."