Originally posted by Cali:
i'm still confused as to how making your daughter have the baby and get married to a guy that doenst want her is the right thing to do.
what would really be good is if palin's baby boy turned out to be her daughters but i'm sure they'd find a way to spin that too
Well, the way a social conservative would answer that question is that first off, abortion is murder, so keeping the baby is moral victory number one. Second, the way I heard it the couple were engaged before they knew of the pregnancy (we won't get into high school engagements, yes I think they're stupid too) so who's to say he doesn't want her? Third, by marrying before the baby is born you've averted the child being a bastard, which doesn't necessarily mean much to a lot of people in this day and age, but may mean quite a bit to certain segments of society, so moral victory number two. Also, where has it been said that Bristol is "being made to have the baby"? This could very well be her own decision based on her own set of morals. The father could very easily be all for keeping the kid as well for same reasons.
For social conservatives, sex before marriage is a heck of a lot smaller a sin than either abortion or having a baby out of wedlock. Hence why having the baby and getting hitched is going to be seen as a good example by the evangelical right.
BTW, I don't necessarily endorse any of these positions, just providing an answer to your confusion.