Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
that maybe true, and it is certainly amusing to people. what i'm simply getting at is even with safe-sex education, how do we know she still wouldn't have gotten pregnant; as well as the underlying assumption by people that she should have just got an abortion.
For the record, I've never said she should have an abortion, but I'm not shy about saying she should at least have that option available to her should she want to choose it.
But the point you're missing is that those who teach safe-sex also talk about the value of abstinence. As a matter of fact, any good teacher will lead with it.
The Evangelicals who talk about abstinence don't talk about the value of safe-sex (they tend to discount it all together), and that's how you get situations
like the one we have here. No one's saying you shouldn't talk about absitnenece or that teaching safe-sex would have prevented the outcome in this case, but we are allowed to attack the policies of Governor Palin and use situtations like the one she's facing here as examples as to why her policies on
abstinenece only are misguided.
That, my friend, is not off limits, and worthy of a debate without being disregarded as an unfair liberal attack.