once again the jokes write themselves...

[BookerT]

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
   it just reinforces the position that he isn't anything but a politician.  that, i think, is one take-away that can be made from that article.  

or this article written six weeks earlier that unfortunately got glossed over because of the controversial cover. personally, i like that obama better than the change zombie he had to be to beat hillary.

[beetsnotbeats]

Originally posted by kosmo:
  apparently Palin isn't going on interview shows... can you imagine her on the Daily Show, it would be even more hilarious if she were on Colbert show...

Forget Biden. I wanna see Palin debate Tina Fey.

[sonickteam2]

Originally posted by pdx pollard:
 
 i wish he was a socialist, but its a pretty ridiculous notion that he is

amen to that. you americans dont know a real socialist from squat.
 
   if he was really socialist...you might call him......a CANADIAN!!!!!  

[azaghal1981]

Originally posted by twangirl:
  where in the hell is GGW?

No shit...

[Mobius]

Originally posted by very sonick:
  [qb]

amen to that. you americans dont know a real socialist from squat.
 
   if he was really socialist...you might call him......a CANADIAN!!!!!           [qb]

What's the difference between a Hockey Dad and a Pit Bull?  
 
 SOCIALISM!!    HAHAHA  . . . . uhhh,  get it?

[kosmo vinyl]

Originally posted by BookerT:
   

Originally posted by very sonick:
  i dont watch Comedy Central cause it doesnt come in HD so i get everything late...in case you're in the same boat...this made me laugh this morning
 
  linq

probably the best TDS segment in a long while. just great stuff. [/b]

I think friday's episode should be required watching for anyone who accuses the Dems of being flip floppers on issues and watch the segment where mccain acceptence speech parrots bush's acceptence speech...
 
  must see link

[Venerable Bede]

Originally posted by vansmack:
 
 But the point you're missing is that those who teach safe-sex also talk about the value of abstinence.  As a matter of fact, any good teacher will lead with it.  
 

it appears that palin  agrees.
 
 i think we can put this thing to rest.

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Well of course she would agree,  now. You know, after both she and her daughter were knocked up, premaritally.
 
 I wonder if John fucked Cindy without a condom when he was cheating on his crippled first wife?
 
 

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
   

Originally posted by vansmack:
 
 But the point you're missing is that those who teach safe-sex also talk about the value of abstinence.  As a matter of fact, any good teacher will lead with it.  
 

it appears that palin  agrees.
 
 i think we can put this thing to rest. [/b]

[vansmack]

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
  it appears that palin  agrees.
 
 i think we can put this thing to rest.

That is good to hear and I was pointing out flaws in Evangelicals more so than Gov Palin, so let's not be to quick to put this one to rest.  The Evangelical's have a long way to go on this argument.
 
 I'll have to find the link, but I was referring to when I pointed out the policies of Gov Palin were amounts of money Alaska appopriated for abstinence-until-marriage programs being substantially more than she appropriated for other safe-sex based programs.  You, of all people, should understand the "what you say" vs. "what you do" argument - it's the core of your problems with the Republican party (and presumably Senator Obama as well based your comments in this thread).

[manimtired]

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  Well of course she would agree,  now. You know, after both she and her daughter were knocked up, premaritally.
 
 I wonder if John fucked Cindy without a condom when he was cheating on his crippled first wife?
 
   

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
   

Originally posted by vansmack:
 
 But the point you're missing is that those who teach safe-sex also talk about the value of abstinence.  As a matter of fact, any good teacher will lead with it.  
 

it appears that palin  agrees.
 
 i think we can put this thing to rest. [/b]

[/b]

someone seems cranky. did you just read the polls or something?

[Venerable Bede]

Originally posted by vansmack:
   

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
  it appears that palin  agrees.
 
 i think we can put this thing to rest.

That is good to hear and I was pointing out flaws in Evangelicals more so than Gov Palin, so let's not be to quick to put this one to rest.  The Evangelical's have a long way to go on this argument.
 
 I'll have to find the link, but I was referring to when I pointed out the policies of Gov Palin were amounts of money Alaska appopriated for abstinence-until-marriage programs being substantially more than she appropriated for other safe-sex based programs.  You, of all people, should understand the "what you say" vs. "what you do" argument - it's the core of your problems with the Republican party (and presumably Senator Obama as well based your comments in this thread). [/b]

fair enough. . .and from the la times article, it appears that palin makes an distinction between safe sex education versus "explicit" safe sex education.  i have no idea what explicit means though.

[vansmack]

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
  fair enough. . .and from the la times article, it appears that palin makes an distinction between safe sex education versus "explicit" safe sex education.  i have no idea what explicit means though.

Haha...I didn't either (although I did raise an eye brow when I read that).  I assumed any conversation about "explicit" and "non-explicit" safe-sex education would have to take place in the NSFW thread.
 
 I hope the Dems are smart enough to make any differences between McCains thoughts and Palin's thoughts on safe-sex teaching a non-issue (unless of course they show actual policy that might be diffferent then her published statements), because anything that paints Palin further to the left would not be helpful.  Of course, the Repubs would want to do the same because they need Palin to look way right for the base.

[Sage 703]

Hey, wouldn't it be great if Sarah Palin did an interview or a press conference to answer some of these questions?
 
 Just one of those off the wall thoughts...

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Isn't she scheduled to be on Good Morning America?
 
 Maybe she could also do the View.
 
 
 

Originally posted by callat703:
  Hey, wouldn't it be great if Sarah Palin did an interview or a press conference to answer some of these questions?
 
 Just one of those off the wall thoughts...

[sonickteam2]

will she do the interview in tongues?