You've completely lost me. Explain what you meant by this:
Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
presuming we believe that zadari is a terrorist leader or has ties to terrorists.
It's not about Zadari or any perceived ties to terrorists. It's about Pakistan not being able or willing to do anything about the Western Provinces, a stance we can no longer tolerate and which is why the US attacked inside of Pakistan again last night. Nobody thinks that Zadari is encouraging their behavior, just that's he's not capable of adequately dealing with it, and if he were to agree to US troops in Pakistan, his already weak government would crumble. There is no inconsistency in this stance between Bush, McCain, Biden, or Obama. Of course Palin didn't say yes last night, but her answer was pretty much a yes.
So again, what's your point?
Sorry, forgot to add my Charlie.